New York Legalizes Moloch Worship

New York state just celebrated…CELEBRATED…passing a law that would allow people to painfully murder babies right up until the moment they pass through the birth canal, and allows non-doctors to perform the procedure. Here's the procedure in its horrific entirety.

Step 1: This fully formed human infant, capable of feeling pain and surviving outside the womb, is injected with digoxin, a cardiac inhibitor used for lethal injection. In Tennessee, inmates are suing to be allowed a firing squad as the alternative to this drug, despite being given morphine to dull the pain, and people are considering this…as a form of mercy for unrepentant, adult murderers, but not innocent infants. The injection is delivered via a large needle directly to the infant's heart.
Step 2) If the infant survives this (which isn't uncommon), they are injected again.
Step 3) Once the baby has been fully murdered, the monster who conceived him/her carries the corpse around in her womb for a few days.
Step 4) If it doesn't occur on its own, labor is induced in this excuse for a human being so she can deliver the 6 lb. corpse of the human being who was forced to endure an excruciating death before taking his/her first breath for the convenience of a degenerate hedonist.

They aren't told this, btw. Abortionists like to pretend babies can't feel pain until they're born. The emotionally manipulative story that opens the "New Yorker" piece on this has the mother saying the child couldn't have survived and she didn't want him to suffer. He suffered far more than if she had carried him to term.
Not sure if New York is this way, but in some states, it is fully legal to murder a living child who is born alive during an abortion, and even if it's not legal, it happens anyway in order to avoid being sued by parents who are now responsible for a child they can no longer legally murder.
Sweet Lord, I pray, I have lost hope that my country can be spared your righteous judgement, but I beg you to remember your flock in the midst of your wrath.

Attached: Crying_newborn.jpg (3008x2000, 743.42K)

Other urls found in this thread:

therightscoop.com/horrible-late-term-abortion-is-now-legal-in-new-york/
archive.is/beth5
lifesitenews.com/news/new-york-legislature-votes-to-protect-roe-legalize-abortion-up-to-birth
democratandchronicle.com/story/news/politics/albany/2019/01/22/abortion-laws-new-york-how-they-change-immediately/2643065002/
cruxnow.com/church-in-the-usa/2019/01/13/pro-lifers-n-y-abortion-bill-could-one-day-make-being-pro-life-a-crime/?fbclid=IwAR2tn3IaQkS5cHAVutrpmR2J1LCbNf7LwnX2FoyCzlioFK84pYvXNvFHrXE
governor.ny.gov/news/governor-cuomo-directs-one-world-trade-center-and-other-landmarks-be-lit-pink-celebrate-signing
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Source?

therightscoop.com/horrible-late-term-abortion-is-now-legal-in-new-york/
Archive link to the New Yorker: archive.is/beth5
Be warned, the New Yorker article is a frustrating pile of prose with the occasional "muh reproductive rights" and "muh doctors and women are the best deciders of whether murder is ok." She even seems to justify the murder of children by saying, basically, "Well, we don't think they're children, so it's fine."

lifesitenews.com/news/new-york-legislature-votes-to-protect-roe-legalize-abortion-up-to-birth
Both chambers of the New York state legislature voted Tuesday on legislation to enshrine a “fundamental right” to abortion in state law and eliminate protections for preborn babies until birth, in votes set to mark the anniversary of Roe v. Wade.
The state Senate voted 38-24 in favor of the so-called “Reproductive Health Act” Tuesday evening, the Albany Times-Union reports, a bill that has repeatedly cleared the state Assembly in years past but been blocked by the formerly-Republican Senate. Following the Senate vote, the Assembly passed it 92-47.
The bill declares that “Every individual who becomes pregnant has the fundamental right to choose to carry the pregnancy to term, to give birth to a child, or to have an abortion,” erases the state’s recognition of preborn babies older than 24 weeks as potential homicide victims, removes abortion from the penal code entirely, and allows licensed health practitioners other than full doctors to commit abortions.
“We have a president who's made it very, very clear that he wants to overturn Roe v. Wade,” Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins declared before the vote. “Today, here in New York, we are saying no […] and we're not just saying no. We're saying that here in New York, women's health matters. We're saying here in New York, women's lives matter. We're saying here in New York, women's decisions matter.”
The Times-Union suggests the bill would allow “late-stage” abortions only if the mother’s “health” is endangered or if the baby is deemed non-viable, but the New York State Right to Life Committee warns that the bill would go much further in practice.
Declaring abortion a “fundamental right” opens the door to invalidating “any limits on abortion” and “mandat[ing] that everyone take part in the culture of death,” the group warns. The bill would also prevent pregnant women whose babies are killed in violent attacks from seeing justice, and have the effect of “authorizing infanticide” by repealing the requirement that a second physician be on hand in the event that an attempted abortion past 20 weeks yields a live infant.

democratandchronicle.com/story/news/politics/albany/2019/01/22/abortion-laws-new-york-how-they-change-immediately/2643065002/
New York legalized abortion three years prior to the landmark Roe v. Wade case, but New York still kept abortion in its criminal code, making it a felony to perform late-term abortions.
The 1970 law defined homicide as "conduct which causes the death of a person or an unborn child with which a female has been pregnant for more than 24 weeks."
The Reproductive Health Act strips abortions from the penal code and adds the following language:
The new law will allow a licensed "health-care practitioner" acting under their scope of practice to perform an abortion when:

Might as well legalize the post-natal abortion too.

Get out of there, Lot.

Dear Lord, Most High and Just God, please watch over and save the countless little ones that will be harmed in the future because of this disgusting law. Please Lord, open the eyes of these sinners and help your flock fight back agianst this grave injustice. Sweet Theotokos and all the saints in heaven, pray for us. In the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit.

Amen

Attached: giphy (2)

(((Jew York)))

Attached: Even_In_Your_Filename_FOE.png (443x376, 25.98K)

Wouldn't surprise me. Every day I feel more and more like we are living in a South Park episode. You know how when you make a joke you intentionally take it to the next extreme, hoping that everyone understands that that would be beyond absurd, except that here no one gets the joke and takes you seriously.

And to think, yesterday was declared by the Church to be a day of prayer for the legal protection of the unborn.

Lord have mercy upon us.

We live amongst demons! There can be no other explanation for this, especially when their zeal to spread their wickedness is taken into account.

The end can't come sooner. I made a thread about this just the other day.


That's a excellent way to put it, seems like common sense is a thing of the past.
Deus Vult

No it can't be true for the love of God.
Even the spartan killing of babies was more merciful.
Its murder pure and simple, even worse than abortion. The baby is fully aware now.
Wtf is going on?

This. There's no other explanation.

Where to?

Why not cleanse it? They're all unarmed cucks anyway. Kill them in the street.

MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT,
MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND
ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH

Firing Squad is arguably the most humane form of execution widely available. Injection can be easily botched and last many painful hours. Hanging can last minutes. Guillotines and decapitation can leave someone in conscious pain for up to 13 seconds. Firing squads offer reliable effectiveness; the prisoner is not going to suffer more than a few seconds on average, no more than a minute in the worst scenario. It's also pretty cheap. We're talking about execution, a grizzly affair altogether. Why not use the most efficient and readily available form of killing? Between injection and firing squad, I'd take firing squad.

The literal city of Jerusalem.

Well if you're going to die, might as well choose the method that has the least chance of being botched.

Attached: 1koma_03.gif (394x328, 37.64K)

I've been saying this for years… normies don't care though. They'll support needles over any other method because "they're less barbaric", pat themselves on the back for being such a good person, and then go back to watching their normie TV shows. Meanwhile, Tyrone gets strapped to a chair and ends up screaming in severe pain for over an hour because the needle or dosage wasn't quite right. Most prisoners themselves prefer other methods, but to Hell with how they feel, because we're doing them a favor by choosing the method that looks the least scary in our minds, right? I wonder how many would still eat halal meat after seeing an animal be tied upside down and slowly bled while screaming… so long as it wasn't shot by one of those evil hunters I guess.

Firing squads made up of bears?

Attached: DOV9S4mUIAA9Mo9.jpg (453x324, 39.48K)

There wouldn't be abortion in the world without the Jews,according to E.Michael Jones.

So when do we know to leave, and when do we know to stay and oppose it?

Chinks exist too.

Chinks killed their child after birth so not abortion.

Moloch worship is already legal. It's called the First Amendment.

No it isn’t. Same reason Jihad isn’t legal. Religious freedom doesn’t mean you get to destroy life.

Btfo

Mark my words, the next step is going to be the legalization of post birth abortion, AKA, murder of babies that are already out of the womb.

We also need to stop using our enemies words. "abortion" is a deadly euphemism that hides the true nature of what it is, which is the MURDER OF BABIES.

Honestly, i don't know of any method of historical infanticide(barring the winnie the poohed up shit some soldiers did) being worse than this shit.

Drowning, death by exposure, burrying them in the sand are nasty, but they seem like compassionate mercies by comparison.

Honestly, the only quick and painless-ish methods of death i can think of are:

a)breathing nitrogen;

b)firing squad;

c)guillotine;


Killing babies and miscarriage causing drugs and solutions have been known since antiquity, across the planet.

Humans are bastards, we don't need some omnipotent jewish conspiracy to trigger man's inhumanity.

Attached: 112585.gif (384x216, 2.15M)

This, even back when I was a pro-life atheist I would argue this point and the only rebuttals would be "slippery slope!" or "Come to think of it, that's a good point." It's definitely going to happen.

firing squad would be my choice. Split second, you dont feel it. You know, funny enough, there's some
line that is taught to troops just in case on leave for Afghanistan. I don't know what it is specifically, but it
roughly translate to "your mother is a dog". Then they just shoot you instead of tortute.

Inert asphyxiation would be #1, since the body only registers choking/asphyxiation by buildup of carbon dioxide and not actually be LACK of oxygen. It's the reason people can die from carbon monoxide poisoning without signs of a struggle.

I guess anything that destroys the brain outright would follow that, then things that remove the brain from the body, then firing squad.

Its not a fallacy, its a fact. One just needs to look at where we are now.
First we tolerated fags, then we stopped describing their "lifestyle" as a mental illness, then we let them "marry", then we let them adopt, and now its illegal to say anything against them, and they persecute us.
First we tolerated fags, now we tolerate transgenders, next it will be pedophiles, and its already on its way.
First we let women murder their babies when they were conceived, with the morning after pill, then we let them murder their babies until a certain number of weeks, and now this. The next step is logically the murder of babies outside their wombs.
No one kills a frog by throwing it in a boilling pot, you put him a normal pot and then slowly raise the temperature until he is killed.

And thus the pro-abortion activists reveal their true selves and their true motives, they want to murder kids.

Is that really how halal meat is made?

I guess Jones meant the legalisation of aborting.
Women don't need a piece of paper to be whores.

I won't be weeping for the next 911 type of event. New York deserves whatever is coming. You chose this.

Tbh, all of us do.

You're not a human until you're born. Stop wining silly Xian, it's not murder.

Is this a parody post? Almost seems authentic.

Among other methods, yes. Look up halal slaughter on YouTube or LiveLeak… they intentionally keep the animal alive while bleeding it.

Agreed.

You damned kike. You absolute snake. You cannot justify the deaths of thousands, most of whom were innocent, including children. You bloody baby-sucking like. Desert jackal.

Christians point out that Kermit Gosnell is serving life without parole (after striking a deal to avoid execution) for killing born alive infants by cutting their spinal cords with scissors, a less painful death on less well developed babies. People whose souls haven't been crusted over by evil think this is a good justification for ending this awful practice, but more and more respond by stating things like "Why is he in prison again?"

Modern society classifies as barbaric not things that are actually cruel, but things that are uncomfortable to watch. If you doubt me, ask why we don't just give drug offenders a public lashing or time in the stocks, then ask yourself if you'd rather be beaten half to death and then go back to work or spending several months locked in a box with criminals.

This is just so hard any more. I've been speaking against abortion since I was old enough to understand what it is, but people out there worship abortion to the point that I think many would cut a deal to eliminate women's suffrage before they would agree to make it illegal to murder children.

ZOG doesn't have the decency to let a man die on his feet as he blasts one last cig

Holy —- it's real, even msm is reporting on it as abortion until birth. What have we become, we are Carthage! This is murder, outright murder!

It is our God given duty as Christians to see that the next generation carries on. Let God punish those who break His command that thou shall not commit murder. Our mission is to ensure that life continues upon God's Earth.

"And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth." –Genesis 1:28

Attached: DxTOEFJWwAEU39Ujpgorig.png (2480x3508, 1.24M)

Attached: 1514763038774.jpg (250x245, 5.74K)

cruxnow.com/church-in-the-usa/2019/01/13/pro-lifers-n-y-abortion-bill-could-one-day-make-being-pro-life-a-crime/?fbclid=IwAR2tn3IaQkS5cHAVutrpmR2J1LCbNf7LwnX2FoyCzlioFK84pYvXNvFHrXE

(checked)

Attached: 62935048.jpg (1000x483, 101.34K)

Now Chris Cuomo is running victory lap by having a bunch of structures lit up in pink to celebrate the passing of this abomination.

governor.ny.gov/news/governor-cuomo-directs-one-world-trade-center-and-other-landmarks-be-lit-pink-celebrate-signing

Americans be like USA is a Christian nation!

Attached: 7B5D94E6-7ED2-408A-8EEF-E8D15351F52C.png (1280x720, 477.38K)

Or men to encourage or abandon them.

One of the earliest patristic quotes talks about men that have a part in it as being equally guilty.

Yes no doubt.

Disgusting chris chan poster. Just because you posted a bible verse it doesn't make your pregnant fetish porn any more justified.

Attached: let's go boys.png (600x1067, 1009.23K)

I hate that bitch and how anime Christian larpers love her.
Pic related is unironically truth.
The nips had the ultimate payback on the burgers for the atomic bombs.

Attached: popefrancisfollowpontifexanimeisthegreatestevilthe1065013.png (500x300, 51.21K)

Where in the post does this user fetishize pregnant women? There is literally nothing wrong with this post. Report it to the mods and they will tell you the same thing.

Why do you hate a picture of a pregnant woman so much? Are you Canaanites or Christians?

Attached: images (5).jpg (225x225, 10.52K)

Absolutely disgusting. Here's a slightly less degenerate edit.

Attached: 1134253432.png (2480x3508, 1.83M)

If NYC and California sank into the sea, it would be.

I'm not sure what's worse … anime larpers or people who post fake tweets.

kek

Seems related, no?

https:// 8ch.net/pol/res/12713069.html

In (limited) defense of the other pic, those were supposed to be reflective marks, not stains. I guess it was implying her dress is made of a more synthetic fabric (which would make sense if it's a maternity dress).

Dude, some autist in that thread is unironically pic related.

Attached: abortion.png (1161x719, 624.45K)

Pro-choice people are now claiming that this new late term law only applies to babies that are certain not to survive. I don't know if that's true, because I couldn't find it anywhere. Yet they ignore the fact that either way late-term the baby will be delivered, or the fact that protections for babies born alive have been repealed. They also criticize the pro-life for reading supposed clickbait articles and daring to oppose murder, as if the leftist media isn't blatantly biased.

are you ever going to get bored posting this rubbish on our board?

Attached: gtfo-dr-seuss.jpg (200x196, 8.93K)

Can we stop with the disturbing mental imagery strategy? Everybody winnie knows already. It hasn't gained an inch of ground in decades it just shoves neutrals off the fence against us. Aside from that it's also uncharitable towards women who regret their abortions and work for the cause of life now.

New York is openly satanic, already was for a long time, and talk means nothing.

"only applies"

That's the ever-present catch.

"This won't be used FREELY, it will be RESTRICTED by all kinds of rules and regulations!"

Every single time there's a mass slaughter, that's how people speak the guarantee that there won't be one.

Attached: brainlet.png (866x900, 94.61K)

Hey, newfriend, did you see these posts before you decided to post? >>760279

Attached: comment_rOAiseEIedgzUKbVoz5WDSW0IY78U0fE.jpg (555x585, 31.06K)

I do not dispute your aim, but I think you're overselling firing squads compared to decapitation. Stories about the decapitated head still responding to stimuli are often overblown. And even if true, even if the brain is still screaming for seconds, it will do the exact same with a heart stopped. The brain will, in fact, take longer to die because there is still a body connected to that head, still muscular contractions that can force blood to the brain and a heart that limps to the finish line. As you say, to die by bullet can take a minute or worse.
Also, if you've ever spoken to someone whose heart has stopped on them, you'll know it's pretty traumatic, and goes on for ages.
What distinguishes a bullet to the heart and a severed head is not compassion, but mess. Decapitation is bloody and messy. A bullet or six, less so, and a poison in the vein even less so. And that's how we rate executions.
What we should do is spontaneous gaseous asphyxiation.


Absolutely this.
I applaud people's intent in the 60s/70s, but too many executions have gone under the needle and gone wrong for this to be in any way tolerable in a civilised society.
If people cared, they'd go for gaseous asphyxiation every time. Nighty-night, murderous scum. You won't be forewarned, but you just won't wake up tomorrow morning.
I suppose there is the stress of knowing this could happen at any time, but frankly I don't advocate execution for anyone but the most hardened, unrepentant, vile individuals who are so far gone, so determined to vent their anger and violence on the world that no attempt to engender repentance has ever worked. Reprobates, if you like. But, even then, the Spirit of God ought not be underestimated, as the most inconceivably unrepentant individuals have repented and turned to God.
These should never be executed, regardless their crimes.
Anyone prepared to consider they've sinned ought to receive suspending or commutation of the death penalty. Yes, I know they can fake it. But that's why they're not released, just their execution is suspended.

This, to my mind, is what Christ demands of us: accommodation of repentance and compassion on the rest.
inb4 commie / jew / leftypol / etc because I know some Zig Forumslacks just lust for the blood of the guilty

Attached: execution-popcorn.gif (500x316, 415.55K)

No I did not. I saw a headline. I responded.
To be fair, that was some serious murdoch press-tier sensationalist headline-making

Yeah I wouldn't want some scumbag to get away with murdering a relative.

But to be honest I have recently pondered the possibility that it could perhaps be more effective to treat crimes of passion and crimes of opportunity along with mere malice differently.
With crimes of passion people could be committed to a different kind of institution, while still a secure one, functioning more as an actual rehabilitative mental institute in which the convicted could be more easily released after 15-20 years if their rehabilitation is deemed to have been successful.

Of course the metrics for evaluating such a thing would be likley to not be without much controversy, along without potential for individuals to pursue a deceptive plea to such in court. For current governments it's just easier to treat it as a thing to be budgeted making cuts to government institutions when desired and even resolving to the release of inmates due to overcrowding and inhumane conditions.

Rather than actually provide something to adequately satisfy the needs of society though, it appears to be easier to just wield the threat of incarceration along with incompetent authorities to the convenience of those with more power and wealth.

For a solution from a religious perspective as you propose, I think forcing them to take a vow of penance and pursuing a life of pious devotion while being incarcerated, on pain of excommunication and subsequent annulment of any clemency, could be a feasible way to go about it.

Gee, I don't know man, you'd think they wouldn't be "bleeding" the animal if it were dead.

Halal slaughter is actually similar to the way prescribed by the Bible and is probably a more humane method short of modern implementations. Say what you want about Muslims and Islam but no need to libel things dishonestly. I wonder if God fearing peasants in places like medieval Czechoslovakia could be held to such a standard.

...

Bloody (((Italians)))…