Is the Creation story literal?

Dropped.

Dropped.

Whenever pseudo-religion nuts like these anons goes directly against science, they get their butts blasted back asswards.
Same thing happens in reverse.

We have this thread every month.

When you say "mortal", do you mean "man" or "capable of death"?
I assumed you meant "man". Is that not right?

Since by man came death, by man came also the resurrection of the dead
For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive
1 Corinthians 15

Seriously you need to be able to at least suspend disbelief long enough to understand the point of the creation story. Nobody's contesting science, we're talking metaphysics.

Attached: beatings.jpg (278x224, 9.76K)

Huh? Of course man was created man. I have no clue how you equate "mortal" with "man".
By "mortal" I mean "capable of dying". Adam and Eve were not created "mortal" or "immortal" but rather they were created with the choice to choose either life or death. By breaking the fast imposed by God, they chose death.

If it isn't interpreted literally, then people make Jesus himself out to be wrong.. or at least a liar. For he referred to Adam and Eve, referring to a man and a woman becoming one.. or saying that those in Judea will suffer punishment for persecuting the righteous, and refers to the example of Abel and Cain.

I don't recall these passages, would you be able to share?

I used to be like some theistic evolutionist like everyone, but as of lately I've become a 6 day YEC

Are you me? When you start taking the Bible seriously, it's hard not to be YEC

What breadpilled me was hearing a sermon about how Jesus' first miracle of turning water into wine was a parallel to creation. There were six jars of water, six days of creation. Spirit hovering over the water in the beginning. Jesus created something that by "Science" would say that it looked old, but it wasn't old. He created something that seemed aged.

Genesis is the most misleading and idiotic book in the Bible if creation isn't true.