Attached: 1546229513421.jpg (1050x902, 131.79K)
My denomination? None, I read the Bible
Zachary Walker
Other urls found in this thread:
albertmohler.com
twitter.com
Luke Williams
Who is that a pic of? I'm confused.
Anyways… Which Bible? :) The Bible we have now was formed by canons set forth by the only church with leaders who had a direct line from the Apostles onward (i.e. now the Catholic and Orthodox churches). The Lord's own words ring true when he said the Holy Spirit would guide us into all truth - and it was these men that the Holy Spirit guided to form what we now have as the Bible. Protestants somehow conveniently forget this fact.. and either think the Bible plopped down from the skies.. or think that early church was ONLY inspired in this one matter. But the burden is on them to explain such reasoning. Why would the Holy Spirit guide them into the canon, but somehow completely abandon them in every other single matter?
And even then Protestants only follow them on the NT. They'd rather follow Jews on the OT… as if race gives you authority over the Holy Spirit. They give power to the very people who reject and killed Christ. How exactly do they have ANY grace?
Carter Green
The Message onlyism is God's gift to man.
William Thompson
submit to Peter
Parker Miller
...
Michael Hall
Submit to Kierkegaard.
Parker Young
Gigachad, eh. I need to keep up on memes. Just a lowly Zig Forums here.
Austin Ross
1 Peter 2:8
Peter was a Calvinist. I've already submitted to him, have you?
Carter Gray
That's just retarded. Even by Calvinist standards. Even if someone were to entertain your theological angle, it'd be more proper to say Calvin was Petrine (although he wasn't.. he was a Catholic-lite Augustinian fanboy. The whole Western hemisphere is trapped in this dialectic).
Ryan White
Actually they added to scripture and called it the deuterocanon.
Nope they were wrong here as well. And this is because they were unable to determine scripture accurately but add random stuff to it. The presence of that random stuff is the proof they aren't inspired.
Robert Reyes
Meant "but added random stuff to it."
Adam Rivera
No, you really don't. These days literally everything is a meme to someone, somewhere. It's best to just shrug and move on.
John Brown
...
Brody Fisher
I always find it amusing how determined some Protestants are to escape the Protestant label. Reminds me of the mental gymnastics my old modernist church did.
Anthony Richardson
weak
Lincoln Richardson
Begome da nide ob resignashun!
Lincoln Sanchez
Are you deadnaming that church?
Christopher Hall
What about Orthos and modernist Catholics?
Levi Butler
:D
Jonathan Smith
Zachary Nelson
Camden Ross
:–D
Henry Long
The early Christians already had as their canon the Old Testament that we have today, and at the time of the apostles their writings were already considered as inspired, so that the NT canon was already technically in circulation.
Blake Davis
The Pharisee canon Protestants use isn't the same OT Canon you have in mind.
Nolan Hernandez
Michael Cox
based and redpilled
Levi Gonzalez
Jacob Jenkins
Jackson Foster
Jace Perez
Why even live?
Isaac Wright
Levi Watson
Go home Pierre
Elijah Williams
Adam Sullivan
(checked)
This
Based and redpilled
Easton Perez
Same user here that you're quoting. Why is that retarded? Why not just answer those questions in good faith? Even I didn't insult Protestants with something so terse. About the only harsh thing I said is they follow Jews, who don't even have the Holy Spirit. Which is true.
Josiah Sanders
YES YES YES
Kevin Reyes
H-how?
Leo Russell
Hudson Campbell
Daniel Edwards
...
Benjamin Kelly
there's your problem right there
Robert Gonzalez
found the other, older problem
David Wood
That's not the worst of it though: The United Church of Canada is an unholy conglomeration of Methodism, Presbyterianism, Anglicanism and all the things in between. It's one thing to merge diocese and congregations, but the United Church of Canada goes beyond that. There is no one, decided doctrine. It is literally a house divided, a Tower of Babel where the sick and twisted congregate with the unknowing and naive.
Nicholas Allen
👆
Bentley Myers
Why do Churches of different faiths try to combine together like a bad voltron? Is it so they have a better voting block?
Christopher Butler
Money, I guess.. better way to maintain churches and have more funds…especially as each one individually has dwindled in extreme numbers over the 20th century (mainline Protestants dropped like flies pretty much).
Angel Powell
Just to add, it's also to fund more national or global efforts (shared publishing or learning materials, etc) that they struggled with on their own.
Parker Lewis
Ecumenism
They think unity permits compromising doctrine, when in reality unity is only an objective for the LOCAL church
Oliver Gray
All of those mainliners are pretty much the same on doctrine though (individualistic, and only care about the Bible in the broadest of terms), so it's easy for them to unite. About the only difference is the government and liturgy (no small thing actually, but it is to them).