There is a difference. Assuming your premise that the 12 apostles that were martyred for the hoax is true which it isn't they died knowing full well they were lying to people. To what end? The Apostles never got rich or powerful from it. All they got was persecution and death.
Muhammad (piss be upon him) died of a fever and never faced persecution in fact he lived like a king like St. Peter and others did.
All the jihadists that were radicalized after the "prophet"'s death didn't know Islam was a big lie.
Why did Jesus have to die?
The implications here is not that the resurrection is necesseraly true because they died for Jesus, the implication here is that they probably were truthful honest people, and weren't trying to deceive them. The apostle's martydom is only one of the reasons of christianity's truthfulness.
That is not a hoax. Hoax implies you know it is false but still pretend it is true. People who die for islam don't secretly believe islam is a false religion.
Again, can you mention one person who has been willing to get tortured and killed to defend a hoax?
Frankly, if God is too much of a coward to step up and take responsibility for his actions and his followers are more than happy to enable his reckless behaviour under the common argument "muh free will exonerates God", why should I, or anyone, even bother following the impotent retard?
I see now why the kikes laugh at Christianity. It's a joke religion predicated entirely behind 'Heaven on a Stick,' don't mess up or you're going to suffer for eternity! This farce is unnecessary.
I spit on god.
Really just think about it. If your son murdered his brother then of course he should be punished. But wouldn't you contemplate your failures as a father?
God isn't infallible, so why would I follow him?