As a Catholic, I don't understand Pope Francis

How is that possible that this pope has way more facility to kiss the feet of muslim african economic invaders than to let devout Catholics kiss his papal ring ?
Is this a clown world seriously ?
He goes out of his way to help people who don't deserve to be helped since they extremely abuse the Catholic generosity and yet, he plays all shy and timid when faced with devout Christians who are dedicated to the Church.
To be honest with you, I find it disrespectful.

You people over think things too much.
The Pope wanted to prevent an outbreak of the flu.
Now, can we please get over the fact the Pope didn't want his ring kissed?

Was it hygienic to kiss the feet of African people then ?

Attached: 234e32r.jpg (367x613, 41.45K)

Careful OP. Mods might ban you for criticizing the angelic Holy Father Francis. 2+2=5.

Thats why the feet were washed before hand, or did you conveniently forget about that?

I forgot about that but even then, it's a very unhygienic part of the body, especially since we wear shoes.
Furthermore, it's easy to take a paper and clean the ring between each kisses.

But he didn't have a wet wipe at the time. No sense crying over spilt milk. The past is the past.

Sure dude. The Holy Father didn't have a wipe in all the Vatican. The diseased peasants were just reeking of the flu. It's not like Christ embraced the lepe- ah heresy! I've been excommunicated.

So, he was worried about spreading germs.

[/nonissue]

Again, Francis is nothing like Christ.

Attached: Christ_cleans_leper_man-e1457980075499.jpg (600x300, 77.13K)

Do you think the Pope is supposed to be the literal Christ?

No, I'm just doing a compare and contrast. Look at how he recoils from his own followers.

Yeah … so horrified.

Attached: terrified.jpg (594x413 57.07 KB, 45.68K)

YES

How many lepers have you embraced today?

And exactly how many influenza pandemics can be traced back to the Papal ring? Or for that matter any outbreak throughout the history of all the rings?

no you retard, he is a vessel with whom the tiggas kiss the ring. It's for the sacraments, you being able to kiss the ring helps with the sins.

this post was good except for this part

I know what kissing the ring does, bud.

Thankfully, none, thanks to the Pope's discernment.
If you think this is supposed to make me lose my faith in Jesus' Church, you try in vain.

Attached: 8664252-3x2-700x467.jpg (700x467, 46.33K)

We have this thread every week, and every week the same things are reiterated:
1. The Pope is not without sin or personal error.
2. The Pope is not, by virtue of his very person, infallible.
3. There have been—and likely will be—worse popes than Francis.
4. The Faith is not represented by the Pope, it is shepherded by him ;the Faith is represented by you and me.
5. God is the supreme leader of the Church.
6. Acts of charity, e.g., washing the feet of the migrants, are a holy obligation which the Faithful must participate in.
6a. The recipient of charity needn't be without sin or personal error.
7. We have a thread for these kinds of petty complaints

It is not "economic invader"
It is simply invader who goes replace europeans. They are fully aware of it. They do it because muh economics too. But their invasion is not about economics in the end.

Another Catholic in denial of their own religion. Your pope is actively assisting the genocide of Christians and the destruction of Christendom. Your priests and cardinals are raping children on an industrial scale. There are a higher percentage of homosexuals in your clergy than a leather bar in the Castro. The Jesuits have been kicked out of over 80 nations for plotting against the government.

The Catholic church is evil. It is as far from Christianity as it can possibly get. If you actually loved God, you wouldn't be defending the Roman cult, you'd be warning people to stay away from it

Attached: Brap.jpg (640x960, 153.88K)

I guess I gotta convert to Basedtists huh, with the King James Bible who God himself wrote correct?

I don't know, I'm not exactly certain what's wrong with this? How do Protestants and Orthodox accuse the Pope of being a crazy God-Emperor, but then jeer him when he does acts of tremendous humility? If Francis accomplished cooling relations through this, he's done a palpable act of peace-making.

Notice how all of these "acts of humility" just happen to have press photographers in attendance? What an odd coincidence!

He's a world leader, what's so coincidental about it?

It's sad seeing people rationalize like this… It isn't 2013 anymore, we know what Francis is now.

...

Virtue signalling isn't humility just like the pope isn't Christian.

He's a shill. Also, I wouldn't be surprised if he is an actual satanist..

Why do mods keep deleting this image?

Attached: 1555051427136.jpg (640x960, 101.52K)

He is literally kissing their SHOES lmao

would you rather have him kiss feet in private?

in any case, there's nothing Francis could do to please you. you're a reviler.

so what you're saying is that doing any public acts are null, which isn't what Christ is saying

did Christ sin by healing the sick on the Sabbath?

Catholics on this board will actually defend this.
I'm a Catholic, and I'm not wondering so much whether or not we should accept this… moreso whether or not a reformative war against the vatican is justified. To say it's been compromised would be like saying porn might be harmful.

13 “You call me ‘Teacher’ and ‘Lord,’ and rightly so, for that is what I am. 14 Now that I, your Lord and Teacher, have washed your feet, you also should wash one another’s feet. 15 I have set you an example that you should do as I have done for you. 16 Very truly I tell you, no servant is greater than his master, nor is a messenger greater than the one who sent him. 17 Now that you know these things, you will be blessed if you do them.


Begone Satan.

If he stopped facilitating the Islamification of Europe that would please me. God gave us this pagan welcoming, Jewish press fearing cuckold to punish us.

Who are you to know the Will of God? At the least, you shouldn't revile a man for following the Word of God, much less the Pope.

Yeah, I'm saying that if this had been an act of genuine humility he would have waited to do it until they were in private. "Acts of humility" done in front a camera are rarely motivated by genuine humility, I'm sure you would agree.


Jesus didn't go into the synagogue dragging a crowd behind him for the express purpose of showing off.

Ratzinger is pope until death. This guy here is a sodomite criminal, who harbors child abusers, that were planted to destroy the catholic church. He is fully financed by the jewish mafia to support the invasion wars, create as much confusion in the catholic followers, create hate in all non Catholics, and protect the terrorist state "Vatican City" by being the untouchable mascot for a religious denomination, that was marked for destruction since it's inception, because it was created to oppose jewish crimes. Yet the real criminals on top are not the khazarians, the jews, the fake pope or the pedo monsters…it's the Catholics who let it all happen and still support this nightmare.

Me, Satan… I accuse you of a cowardly, untrue faith

Ratzinger covered up for child molesters, too. It's funny that you actually think there are any major differences between post-VII Catholic Popes.

Matthew 23:9
And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven.

The way they get around this verse is they claim that they are only calling priests "father" in their capacity as substitutes for Christ, so they are actually only calling God father.

I just can't stand to see someone act like they're in the word of God when they are not, like that guy in this thread.

Attached: BibleKJV.jpg (320x240, 27.2K)

You misinterpreted my post. I in no way defended Ratzinger or any other pope, they fully deserve capital punishment. What I meant was that one cannot quit being a pope. You also cannot be a catholic without opposing jewish crimes and you can not be a Christian if you put down the old testament. There is only one truth, everything afterwards is based on corruption. That is a sin.

Actually the major new trend these days is "Christians" rejecting half the New Testament because they claim Paul was hateful and not Christian for condemning homos.

It's all heresy. Same with shirking away from your responsibilities by creating new denominations. There is one God, one Cross, and one Bible. Believe it. Live it. Protect it.

Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.
Of course you do, Pharisee.

He needs this erratic behavior in order to mask the pedophile scandal.

All Latins ever want to talk about is the pope.

pope is a pervert

Attached: tawhid flag.png (128x128, 3.38K)

FTFY

you don't have to understand, all you have to do is SUBMIT!

Matthew 23:9
And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven.

...

He spent an hour letting people kiss his ring. I agree that's it's really not a good look getting impatient but let's try to give him his credit.

If anything, I'm grateful that we're still at the point where someone like Francis can be the pope. If the average lay Catholic was pope, we'd already have the church ordaining women, doing away with clerical celibacy, permitting contraception and preaching universal salvation

Christ was simply asking his disciples to be humble, unlike the Pharisees and scribes who sat in Moses' seat, drank the finest wine, wore the finest clothes, and otherwise held themselves in high regard. If we were to be as literal with the following verse, we would call no one on Earth but Jesus Christ "teacher", and yet I don't see Protestants rallying outside of schools with Matthew 23:10 signs.

It says "call no man YOUR father upon the earth", and in the KJV the word "you" is plural, while "thee/thou" is singular. Jesus was talking to "the multitude, and to his disciples" (Matthew 23:1), and because He used the plural form instead of the singular we know that He is talking about multiple people all calling one man who is not their father, "Father" as a title.

Yes, father is a title you give to the man that helped make you. If you call your Dad "Father" and not "penis Mommy" you are the highest of hypocrites.

Those child diddling priests are pedophiles. For most of history, there has been no distinction between a homosexual and pedophile.

Attached: 1547406795111.png (1269x2009, 2.59M)

Ok let me try to explain this again because you obviously didn't get it. Jesus commanded A GROUP to not call one man their collective father. THAT GROUP has one Father who is in heaven, to call a man the father of THAT GROUP would be to put him in the position of God as the Father of a group of people not related by blood. It has nothing to do with calling your biological father by what he is, because in doing so you're not placing him in the position of God you're just calling a spade a spade.

Jesus was commanding that God, the Father, be acknowledged separately in His Divine Personhood. It could not be applied to blood-relations, for obvious reasons; neither can we then take your claim because the Apostles themselves frequently referred to their catchumen as spiritual children in the Bible itself.

When Catholics call the Pope Holy Father, they are paying respect to the institution, they are not considering the Pope 1:1 with God, the Father.