Brit/pol/ #2294: Mozzie May Edition

...

most mainstream politics between left and right is mostly on economic policy, so using an argument beyond that provides an additional dimension to work in. The problem may be that the person you're talking to is deracialised to the degree that they won't even understand that as an argument, and will be completely unable to apply it to themselves


>implying smh there's a stock photo for everything

Attached: ClipboardImage.png (474x689, 409.07K)

...

It was partly economic, but economics was a secondary issue.
It's like wearing velvet robes might be nice, but if you're wearing them while lying in a coffin dead there's not much point.

Tbf lad it was partially an economic decision, the negative effects of immigration on the economy aren't the best reasons to stop it but they are legitimate reasons.
Apples and oranges tbh, being a tranny or a paki are personal identity traits that have zero economic value whereas Brexit was in part influenced by economic factors.
Not sure what to say to this tbh, but I would point out that the British identity ideally wouldn't have much relevance in everyday dealings between British people if the British people were all actually British.

As usual with arguments it depends on who you are using it on.

thanks, lad

Attached: '.png (418x408, 23.83K)

does are NHS money fund tranny surgeries?
and how about them Asians on bennies?

meant for

yes lad but the root of those problems isn't economic, though it intersectionally kek is related to economics