please leave you stupid faggot
>>>Zig Forums
I recently turned 18 and now I have a little question...
John Taylor
Anthony Torres
>>>Zig Forums
Christian Bailey
No, giving you the benefit of the doubt, you misunderstand what I was trying to say. I'm telling you I'm not an extremist in either direction. To me Zig Forums and Zig Forums are the same. I know this is hard for many to grasp, but to me the minutia they disagree on is overshadowed by their collectivist basis.
Well, I've never seen a democracy so I have no idea about that. I'm told they had it in Greece once, but that's a long time ago. What we have is a puppet show and a way of justifying bullshit by oligarchs as if it's some sort of majority decisions. That's not new, though. It's how it's always been. The only thing that's changed is that people now are too dumb to realize it.
I understand me having change in racial demographics as a part of the change that is coming triggers you no end. But that was a somewhat inconsequential part of the change I'm describing, not even my main point. But I do stand by it. I've never seen anyone but western and eastern people run any sort of halfway functional social structure, so why should I assume that other people will magically gain skills in social coordination and cooperation as soon as they arrive here? That's just socialist ideology, i.e. a sort of religion. Go look at some videos of parliament sessions in South Africa. That's what's coming. Now, as I said, democracy is a sham so that's not an end all, but it's still going to be quite the change from what you're used to, because most people are going to take that shit seriously.
Don't play dumb.
You have science and then you have science. You have enlightenment age science, that described predictable models and could be used to make shit like functional machines and progress. Then you have modern science that's consensus based fantasy sessions by communist low-iq university drones. This is bullshit like gender studies and psychology (and it's creeping into the natural sciences too, have been for some time.)
You can tell the difference by that the latter doesn't work, creates nothing new and has no real meaning beyond having retards employed doing "science."
This change should have been predicted (and probably was) when the academic systems changed from bringing in the small highest-iq segment of autist savants from the general populace and containing them in an environment where they were allowed to say and think whatever they wanted to what is a modern academy. That's quite a different place, where any borderline retarded mouth-breather is cheered on to graduate as long as he's able to fill in his loan applications.
That's why there haven't been any scientific progress for almost a hundred years now. What's the latest real, new practical development? The transistor? It's function and application was mapped out when people still rode around in horse carts. Sure, we've specialized and effectivized, but actual scientific discovery isn't happening anymore.
Connor Richardson
Is this just you trying to deny that you are wrong but being stubborn about it?
Hi sargon of akkad.
So, the americas are defined as western and the people consisting of it originally were a multitude of people consisting of these ethnicities en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
and Canadian natives.
Well, sorry to say but your people are pretty much tibalistic as those on the easteren part of the globe.
so is this another "science" term where it actually means Liberal consumed in idenity politics and postmodernism but you just have to rely on contex clues?
What's here? I assume america. Can't they cordinate bettween each other as the basis of surviving and are able to be autonomous? What kind of question is this. It's not like they are deaf, dumb, and blind.
I guess I could let this slide, those are proably humanists that you are refering to and not materialists.
What do yo mean by this? seems like dribble, can you rephrase it?
Nathaniel Perez
Severely underated post.
My anus is already feeling it
Ryan Adams
I think it's fair to say I've tried to interact with you in a patient manner, but you are obviously either very dishonest or a complete moron and I don't think anything fruitful will come from continuing our exchange.
Parker Robinson
How am I dishonest or a moron?
Are you just going to be hostile to me this whole thread?
Hudson Rogers
Because if you're not intentionally misinterpreting and twisting everything I'm saying in some strange attempt to annoy me then you're actually misinterpreting and twisting everything I'm saying because of a lack of mental faculty.
No one but you are amazed and bewildered when I use a term like "western people," or imply a concept like "science" can have a changing connotational definition.
If you're actually discussing honestly and straightforward here then you seem to have trouble with grasping basic common concepts and colloquial speech. If so you should seek to educate and train yourself before interacting with neurotypical people. Good luck.
Anthony Ortiz
It's my attempt to get you to define terms clearly so we don't misinterpret each other in the first place.
Where did you get the impression that I was flabbergasted at your poor choice of words.
Zachary Hall
Yeah, but as I try to explain to you, that's not normal behavior. Everyone understands perfectly well what I mean when I say "western people," except you. It's not an obscure concept. There is really no "misinterpreting" it barring extreme autism. Go read the wikipedo article on "western world," if you're genuinely confused.
When you try to make it seem like "western people" is some vague term you come off as trying to do a weird strawman meta-argument about how I'm being mentally lax in my way of formulating my arguments. Which I'm not, because as I say, anyone that's not retarded have no problem understanding what "western people" means.