...
Microkernel means I'm interested, beats Linux and could even beat Darwin
mach was called mach for a reason.
Its called mach because its faster than the other slow as shit micro kernels. Context switching absolutely is slower
...
Listen you faggot when google aquired android they could still can changed it into somthing actually good because it was still early in development. But instead android continued to turn into shit it's not gonna be better this time, it's gonna be the same, google developers are just incompotent.
Mach was the first-ever microkernel. It had to have been faster than existing (monolithic) kernels.
Mach was not a micro kernel until version 3 in the mid 90s. It was BSD with message passing.
Microkernels are associated with being slow by laymen because the first ones were slow.
wiki.c2.com
At this point, even if microkernels are slower than monolithic, the security benefits would be more than worth it.
More than security, they are reliable.
youtu.be