Democracy tends to give consistently mediocre outcomes. Among other areas, that's good for countries because all the alternatives are more likely to fail catastrophically, even if they're better in the best possible case.
Software projects aren't countries. Leaving a small software project is much easier than leaving a country, so you can get a somewhat working free market/survival of the fittest thing going. A software project that has a BDFL from the beginning is unlikely to become popular unless the BDFL is good, so bad monarchs are automatically filtered out.
Unfortunately, that doesn't extend to succession in established software projects. If you appoint a new leader and they turn out to be bad it's much harder for the free market to take care of it. Forking is expensive. Even good people aren't necessarily good leaders.
Another one bites the dust: 9front goes SJW
(((Why do you think that is?)))
That's why you establish a hereditary monarchy. Somebody who shares similar genetic base and was raised in a similar memetic environment is more likely to end up sharing similar traits, including being a good leader.
lol
That's not nearly reliable enough. Selecting from multiple clones might work, but societal progress is too fast to replicate the memetic environment properly in another generation.
fuk
How much is probable that Gentoo will stay uncucked?
I'm currently using devuan/obsd/void; devuan is sjw/faggot distro, obsd is fine, but has no chance staying uncucked, void is essentialy pony-tier distro with fine init system.
Should I just go crux and crucify all evil I have on my hards?
It's not perfectly reliable, but it's more reliable than any existing alternative.
Pick based on quality, not politics, and you'll be a lot happier.
Even if politics affects quality, it's not the only thing affecting quality.
People have been fed democratic propaganda from birth because most countries are democratric now.
Today's representative democracies claim 2 things:
I think the first is right, but I'll call retarded whoever thinks the second is right, there's no way anybody genuinely believes this.
Aside from harmful.cat-v.org