Debian thread

sysv is so shit distros moved to systemd because of it. let that sink in
openrc is even worse. systemd is much, much better than most inits. i only prefer s6 over systemd because of the FEATURES it offers

this. fedora is fucking amazing

So what you're saying is that the way to prevent suicides in men is to get them to succeed in their career and-or get them to start an open source linux distribution? There you go, the psychology of suicide in men is solved just by giving them the feeling of success. Now this conclusive proves that Ian was murdered because there's no way he'd commit suicide being such a successful man.

I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're referring to as Linux, is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I've recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux. Linux is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning GNU system made useful by the GNU corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX.

Many computer users run a modified version of the GNU system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of GNU which is widely used today is often called "Linux", and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the GNU system, developed by the GNU Project.

There really is a Linux, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use. Linux is the kernel: the program in the system that allocates the machine's resources to the other programs that you run. The kernel is an essential part of an operating system, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete operating system. Linux is normally used in combination with the GNU operating system: the whole system is basically GNU with Linux added, or GNU/Linux. All the so-called "Linux" distributions are really distributions of GNU/Linux.

...

Did you just list some of the things wrong with systemd and blame sysvinit for it?

stop bumping this

Wat

Not complying to their demands?
I could think of a lot of reasons why Ian would be useful to them.

Could you name one, keeping in mind he hadn't been involved with Debian for a long time?

devuan > debian