Emacs/systemd soon fellow tech enthusiasts

It's an OS pretending to be an editor and was considered harmful before you were born.

Emacs sucks ass, and you should kill yourself.

t. vim soyboy

Have you ever used vimscript? Did you wish it wasn't awful?

Also what's the best tiniest emacs? Zile? μ?

Do you also believe that vaccines cause autism?

Not only do we have three threads about this, you have absolutely no idea how systemd works. I don't use systemd, and even I know what a unit file is. And it's hilarious, because there's something worse, far more controversial in the new Emacs release, right under your nose, but Zig Forums is so triggered by systemd that they don't know how to panic over trivial things correctly.

It does, you retarded tripfag, but that isn't inherently bad. Most Asian people drink soy recreationally, like a treat. Retarded white people are the only ones who drink soy religiously, and, even then, the effects are so innocuous compared to things like fatty meats, mint, peppermint, spearmint, licorice, high-PUFA vegetable oils... So you're right in sentiment but technically wrong. I don't even know that you can be so stupid that you would try to refute a strawman with incorrect technical knowledge.

wouldn't shit like phytoestrogens block receptors thus lessening the effects?

An GNU Emacs is first and foremost an Elisp interpreter whose side affect is that it's incredibly portable. Naturally, it's also highly-extensible. Its strength is when it's used as a frontend for Unix tools, making it one of the most powerful and authentic Unix applications, only rivaled by Ed. Its weakness is how extensible Elisp makes GNU Emacs. Many idiots try to implemented software in Elisp that could be done in a superior language. Modules like these benefit from the portability of GNU Emacs but harshly suffer from the technical limitations of Elisp.

Many people conflate Emacsen like µMacs and mg with GNU Emacs, but those Emacsen are only similar to GNU Emacs in terms of bindings and possibly the major/minor mode paradigm. More comparable to GNU Emacs is GNU Zile and Plan9's Acme, both of which are glorified toolkit makers in their own way; if you include GNU Emacs in the toolkit maker triad, it's the most successful and popular of the three tools.

What are you referring to?
The implementation of threads is pretty lacklustre, but I wouldn't describe it as nefarious.