Removing the pedos

Bullshit, pedos go anywhere they aren't actively hunted down or purged. Facebook, Twitter, and IRC aren't remotely secure yet they have loads of pedophiles.
It's like you pedoniggers are so removed from reality from wasting so much time fapping to CP you don't even bother learning the board culture. Congratulations on being a mentally ill normalfag.

If you ask anyone who's worked in the navy or at a prison, nope. Otherwise straight animals often do the same shit if they're locked away from the other sex for long enough, and there's cases like that gay bull LGBT activists saved from the slaughterhouse only for him to lose all sexual interest in males after they moved him to a smaller, comfier farm.

Attached: 1441209071414.png (700x704, 172.23K)

Interesting that the left has also been pushing this narrative super hard recently. Constant spam about how anything related to female anime characters is pedophilia. But at the same time they're also trying to get pedophilia normalized. It seems to be some stratagem to get people to associate pedophilia with anime while at the same time somehow accepting (actual) pedophilia. Anyway, leftists need to be purged.

I didn't make the claim. I don't care if it's a (((sexual orientation))) or if it's claimed to be one by various (((scientific papers))) and (((studies))). Anyone with a brain knows most science past the year 1899 isn't worth looking at because it's (((soft science)))). I'm not the one in here defending child fuckers. Why don't you post some sources faggot.

If that means I want to live in a high trust, white, society with morals then I'm guilty as charged. Don't confuse unwillingness to debate with lack of ability. I don't debate pedos and faggots because they have a mind disease and experience has shown me that they will not debate the issue and will instead argue in bad faith like you're doing by calling me reverse-SJW, telling me I'm the cancer that ruined Zig Forums, and finally declaring your victory because you found some sources from left wing rags to backup your retarded arguments.

My beliefs are simple and backed up by years of proof: Sex outside of monogamy and marriage without the goal of procreation is bad for people. The more partners one has sex with the less likely they are to bond with any of them. Faggots have sex with more partners than anyone. Hence their degenerate behavior and constant need to new kinks. If they had few partners in life like normal people and actually respected what marriage is they wouldn't be such a cancer in society nor would they spread AIDS at the alarming rate they currently spread it. This is why they're constantly on the hunt for new young assholes because people aren't born that way and must be brought into the fold. They should not be raising children simply because they take those children to their faggy parades where people walk around naked. Which again, if they wanted to be accepted into greater society they wouldn't be doing. No one wants to watch men parade down the streets in thongs.

Yes user it was the users that plastered shit all over major websites like OKCupid encouraging people to lynch him for not supporting fag marriage. Perfectly normal things that could happen to anybody.

I'm right as fuck but I can see a link between lolicon slice of life animes and pedoish. Lots of people picked up fetishes from hentai they wouldn't other wise have.

I like you. Never trust any one who claims logic and reason are the only merits in life. Logic and reason cannot compete with the unreasonable. If someone is insane and wants to smash your face in with a rock you cannot reason with him and no amount of logic can change that.

People need to understand that the illogical and the lie is often a better tool than the truth. As long as you win it doesn't matter how honest you were. If you lose then you're dead so it doesn't matter how honest you were.

Understanding the truth is important but it shouldn't be the hill you die on.

If you don't believe pedophiles are parasitic, watch how they try attaching themselves to any growing movement or community. Entry level Zig Forums-tier beliefs are growing more common so imageboard pedos try insisting they're an integral part of the right, while at the same time allying themselves with the left's diversity push and squeezing themselves into security-conscious tech communities. They have no real loyalty to any view, they just want protection from anyone with power so they can spread their degeneracy and find more opportunities to exploit children.

Attached: 1424893424103.gif (701x500, 1.98M)

What a stupid post

SOL shit is often sexualized. Lots of crotch and ass shots.

Pedos are scared of Muslims. That's why the homos have latched onto the alt right or whatever you wish to call it. They know Muslims will murder them so they're trying to co opt the right movement in order to get rid of Islam and save themselves. There's a good podcast called Third Jimpact which covers a lot of the gay mafia's shit in the alt right sphere.

Your reasoning is a classic post hoc fallacy. No matter what the premises are, you'll create a story that makes them support your conclusion, because you do not actually want to evaluate any premises independently but are rather instead entirely precommitted to that conclusion being true. If I told you that some pedos had no taboo sexual contact as children and also lost their virginities at normal ages (which is true of plenty of them as well), then you would (and probably will) find some reason to explain why that also was the cause of their pedophilia.

If your theory is true, then what is the proper age for an individual to be introduced to sex that makes them the least likely to become a pedo? There must be some "sweet spot" if your ideas are consistent.

Do they "pray" (it's "prey" you fucking retard) on young boys in order to convert them to homosexuality, or do young boys who already have homosexual inclinations tend to be more drawn to adult males of their kind?

If some guy pisses me off and I shove a metal rod up his ass to get back at him, am I gay? If I've banged 10000 chicks and 1 guy because I was curious, am I gay? There are obvious non-pedo motivations for sexual contact with children: pure sadism, mental illness/compulsive behaviors/weird OCD shit, curiosity, wanting to try something taboo just because it's taboo, and opportunity ("I'm horny and can't find an adult. I'm not really interested in kids but a hole's a hole and it's available."), which is probably the biggest one.

It's the same reason why a lot of men become gay in prison: greater availability. A guy who would choose an 18 year old over an 8 year old 1000/1000 times if he had the choice isn't a pedo just because he resorts to the 8 year old when he feels like he doesn't. True pedos are at least *more* attracted to the 8 year old than the 18 year old (even if they have some attraction to women too), otherwise the word has no meaning. There are even stories of brain tumors causing pedophilic behavior in people too.

lol every single of one of your brainlet faggots does this exact spiel:

Do they produce you retards in a factory or what?

I was naive enough to believe that forcing people to confront uncomfortable and unpopular truths about race, sexuality, gender, immigration, human inequality, etc. would filter out retards in general. It's clear that was wrong.

That's pretty funny when you remember Islam's infamous tolerance of pedophiles, especially gay pedophiles. A pedo's biggest worry under a caliphate would be competition.

Yeah, pedos never get arrested. Child porn busts never happen. People sharing CP on Facebook or Twitte have zero to worry about, which is why all of the main CP hubs are hosted there and not darknets. You're a real smart one.

l m a o - Please, oh master of the arcane and hip, enlighten me with more knowledge of these until now uncovered Laosian zoopraxiscopes. You are the first person to discover them.

>I didn't make the claim. I don't care if it's a (((sexual orientation))) or if it's claimed to be one by various (((scientific papers))) and (((studies))). Anyone with a brain knows most science past the year 1899 isn't worth looking at because it's (((soft science)))). I'm not the one in here defending child fuckers. Why don't you post some sources faggot.

I did post sources. You just put your ebin kike parentheses around them and ignored them. What sources do you want me to post? Also, the designation of pedophilia as a sexual orientation is based off of neurological evidence, hardly soft science at all.

Colonial Delaware was a high-trust white society with morals. Its age of consent was 7. So you're okay with that?

lol the truth sure makes you butthurt, doesn't it?

Harvard endorsing objective observations of neurological differences between pedo minds and non-pedo minds = "left wing rag" - This is why you're a brainlet.

So we should make sure that girls are bequeathed to their partners as young as possible, before puberty even, to make promiscuity as unlikely as possible? Since we know niggers and other shitskins don't care about the law or any standard of morality, promoting the age of consent is just creating a universal policy for white men of "Tyrone and Muhammad get a turn first."