Without proof, that looks like backwards logic
"DUDE THIS IS DARKNET!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
You could keep an eye on the activity of the site by counting the requests it receives.
Even better you could be checking the ratio of requests to data transmitted and get a better image of what's going on.
Your argument was about the average guy using .onion sites, not hosters.
If you intend to profile people using the darkweb, you'd be better off evaluating activity along the lines of (time spent on-site based on activity log)*(Multiplier based on average time spent with material from site (for example, how long an average pedo faps to an archived CP-pic multiplied by (filesize dled/average archived single CP pic)) to account for activity-heavy but data-light sites like forums and vice-versa as well as CP sites.
Just because I download a few episodes of 1080p anime a day doesn't mean I spend a hundred times more time watching anime than writing on imageboards.
eh, they use a backdoor, identify him, frame him.
not that impossible
Asante of the shroomery denies it being compromised though. He said it's only been involved in one unrelated case about divorce in the courts.
The problem is that you're assuming a very surprising thing (tor being compromised) to explain a mostly trivial thing (one guy getting caught),: without evidence to justify that, it's nothing but conspiracy wankery.
the silk road guy was v& because he used his email on the clearnet once
Nibba you braindead
I said "most of Tor traffic", I never said anything about Tor users. Just saying a statistical fact that Tor is used by and for MOSTLY pedoshit. And the ammount of data mostly used by Tor is pedo stuff. So in conclusion, if your Tor network spends petabytes transfering pedo material and few kilobytes transfering text connected to privacy concerns and whistleblowing, what do you think what Tor supports more? What is conclusion here?
kys
Nigger nigger nigger nigger
Happy?
Glupkoooo taj mali lutak vozi auto praviiiii