University taught programmers. Just look at this thread. If you wasted your time in Uni with CompSci instead of learning something you can't find a shitton of pajeet-friendly learning material for, you are probably one of the spastics who complain about "We learned this in Uni, not this"
I'd direct this at all the faggots at the top of this thread if I would give a shit
Hahahaha. In my country university is basically free, our living standards is one of the highest in the world, no rapefugees anywhere, harder and stricter no-bullshit universities as well. I know a girl who transferred from Stanford to here and went from straight A's to being clueless. The USA nannies you through Uni, you never learn to get your shit together. Fatasses.
I agree with this. Harvard suffers from the worst grade inflation in the United States and likely the world. That means that no one there has to try to get good grades, and the notion of any prestige from getting A’s is a bold-faced lie. Those colleges are literally just job factories that market themselves so well, over centuries, that they have managed to fool tons of people that they’re actually worth a shit. I imagine Stanford is no different, it just has a Silicon Valley edge to it.
These glib spastics learn a bit of syntax, and think that equates to a degree. They'll know whatever data structures are presented by their language and scarcely any algorithms. Higher abstraction and low-level details are complete mysteries to them. They certainly could learn this without going through academia, but they don't. You know the type, there's even one in this thread: . Typically these tards assume comsci students spend four years learning a language. Maybe some community college comsci teach programming, but universities focus on concepts. You are expected to learn the language on your own, and ask TA's for help.
Windows 10 users who think they're in any position to lecture someone who either switched to Linux or hasn't updated from Windows 7.
At least you only see this on gaming forums.
Anyone that calls Linux a hobby
Opposed to a "lifestyle", or "sexual preference"?
Anything that requires an unusual amount of expense or non-public access attracts the worst of the worst.
Cryptocurrency should be used as fucking money, not stocks. The ones who shill the currencies as if they're stocks are the biggest faggots of all, because they are to actual stock market traders like DYELs are to bodybuilders and athletes.
Used to be bad, but considering how mainstream apple is, only the apple purists are the most cancerous of the applefags.
the ones I've encountered are especially stuck-up twats, and when I asked for a specific request in Zig Forums support, they said "HURRDURR YOU SHOULD USE THIS THING YOU SPECIFICALLY SAID YOU DIDN'T WANT BECAUSE I SAID SO!" and they wonder why I flipped out at this shit?
curiously, I have yet to see a Gentoo user as cancerous as an archfag, despite both being notoriously manual distros, why is that?
That's interesting, I see more people who actually bitch about these editors and people that use them, than those who religiously preach it.
Why the fuck do so many of these people exist on Zig Forums? what reason do people need to shit on what is essentially the standard of programming languages?
Is actually one tizuna-posting avatarfag, and another who abuses codeblocks and quotes from a forty-year-old book.
My lifestyle preferences are Linux and Unix. Nobody can control what I do in my bedroom.
Are you retarded? I picked up a CompSci bachelors textbook and the Dragon book in my spare time while getting a degree that's not laughably easy. CompSci is retardedly easy, actually designing Hardware is the challenging part about this field. Computer Engineering is a little less retarded but still infested by "muh full stack development" retards you fuckface. You're defending a degree that qualifies you for web-development.