This is a point I've seen thrown around: if anybody starts an instance with whatever software in these protocols that flushes posts and maybe mixes up things further for a more anonymous approach, I would at least use it to chat around since such a concept isn't really a big hit with social media so it would see minor usage.
GNU Social
Aiden Bailey
Ethan Clark
No. Other way around.
Isaiah Fisher
Matrix > GNUSocial
Luke Gray
Assume everything on public networks is archived by gazillion of search engine spiders. There is no reason in keeping identity at all, and here we come to a shitty image board replacement with character limit and retarded discussion threading.
Juan Collins
What's wrong with dumpster-diving hackers? At least it's not some "HYPE HYPE ANONYMITY PRIVACY FUCKING TRUST US" garbage run obviously by agents
William Wilson
What GNU project that isn't directly related to gcc or emacs isn't.
Evan Torres
Can a right-wing site exist on Mastodon or have they ensured they can suppress all speech that isn't focused on burning down society?
Lincoln King
Btw, "right-wing" at this point in the decline basically just means uncensored or lightly moderated. Free speech is now a concept so far to the right it's practically Hitler.
Connor Roberts
tech illiterates on tech are right wing.
What a surprise.
Of course you can, it's just a software.
Brayden Hernandez
Hey clueless reddit spacer, the issue is the federated moderation, what controls they have, if hashtag searches can be censored, and how safe servers are from attack. When I hear things like,
and realize by "misuse" they don't mean the censoring of non-left wing views but that non-left wing views weren't sufficiently censored I get worried about how they've engineered that.
Sooo.. yeah.