802.11ax WiFi router

Does anyone care, or nah?
archive.is/lwgc4
snbforums.com/threads/rt-ax88u-fcc-docs-all-posted.48504/
The triband is 700$, which is good if you're the goodest of goyim, while the dual is around 400$.

Attached: P_setting_fff_1_90_end_500.png (500x500, 22.96K)

Other urls found in this thread:

tomato.groov.pl/?page_id=164
tomato.groov.pl/?page_id=166
repo.or.cz/w/tomato.git
bitbucket.org/pl_shibby/tomato-arm/commits/all
invidio.us/watch?v=dXo54Au9x2Q
invidio.us/watch?v=aPoe4WtX2mU
ubnt.com/unifi/unifi-ap-ac-lr/
archive.is/91Muw
web.archive.org/web/20021001142139/http://www.necmitsubishi.com:80/products/home/ProductDetail.cfm?product_id=159&division=NEC
slcentral.com/c/h/r/nec/lcd2110/page6.php
ebay.com/sch/i.html?cmd=SKW&_nkw=ruckus r720&_sop=15
archive.is/8QLpc
archive.is/P2gCM
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

They are just trying to push people into buying all this new electronic devices and I say fuck that my wifi network is WIDE open ! :-o

Attached: FREE WIFI.png (300x300, 14.63K)

Buy the newest device and let all the shitskins use your wifi for free goy

Attached: 85e84f3d799ef06b284df23a8d67aa0ee1d0fe0cac9c61bc5170d79b279cf7c0.png (600x317, 185.62K)

YES !

Attached: TPB.png (800x400, 68.2K)

does it run openwrt?

1)
2) Who cares? Ethernet is better and I don't care about cables running in my house.

Whoops, the first link was supposed to be OP.

routers are a meme. they are products worse than webdev. just put a wireless card into an old box.
am i on /g/? and why would you use wifi for gaymen? the site you linked is some gaymen shit

oh yes, there is a jewish conspiracy which caused all 10 of these guys to run open wifi

Attached: Linksys_WRT54G.jpg (800x600, 43.93K)

Attached: hooknose.JPG (500x500, 147.31K)

Lady Gaga????

It hasn't even released yet, and I hear the firmware is pretty shit.
It'd be interesting to break through the legal amount of range to see how far the signal could go though.

Attached: ROG-Rapture-GT-AX11000-1220x813.png (1220x813, 437K)

Insult me if this question is stupid, but couldn't you connect a wire from the antenna jack from your wifi router to the side of a metal skyscraper/building to turn the entire building into an antenna and provide wifi for the whole building?

Antennas should be tuned to their required frequencies, which is why there are different types of antennas for AM radio, FM radio, wifi, etc. Additionally, one router connected to a building-sized steel antenna probably won't have enough power for a decent signal to noise ratio.

It depends on the frequency of the wave. A very low frequency device actually could peirce the noise floor at moderate levels of power for a skyscrapper type building. Actually you can bounce waves off metal objects and achieve similar results with wifi going super long distance if the modem is modded to excess power specs of 802.*

Tomato firmware is way better.

tomato.groov.pl/?page_id=164

TFW the overpriced router meme became real because normies think a $200 router is that much better than a $50 one.

Are you retarded? It's proprietary.

Actually your wrong but I understand most techs are a bunch of iphone clowns these days.

Attached: iphone-spy.jpg (1600x1600, 1.25M)

If you put a sticker that says "for gay men" on something there are retards who will flock to dump all their life savings on it.

N just werks but.

But...?

tomato.groov.pl/?page_id=166
repo.or.cz/w/tomato.git
bitbucket.org/pl_shibby/tomato-arm/commits/all

thats twice as fast as sata.
for what purpose
to get top speeds off the 10G fiber line running to your house?

Right? Even mSATA and m.2 will have a hard time keeping up with that.
It's technically consumer products, but I really doubt normalfags will give a shit about a ROUTER.

Attached: aed4958a0ab919c8c82b8b4d4dfd62f4-d8tr47c.png (623x719, 25.97K)

Would tomato even run in these big time routers? Would custom firmware give you the option to retardedly expand your range beyond legal FCC limits?

Attached: Screenshot_20180801-094216_Dolphin Emulator.jpg (1449x1440, 923.9K)

I run OpenWRT on my router and it allows me to arbitrarily set transmission power, with no regard to legal limits.

Won't the electronics get fried at some point? Do you have a way to measure whether it actually does allow you to get whatever power you want, or is there a silent cutoff point?

Yeah, sorry, I'm retarded remembered it being proprietary and kikepedia confirmed, so I shitposted. Anyway, are there really stuck on 2.6?

I don't have a way to measure it, but if I increase it the router does heat up more.

2.6 has been maintained and is up to date because anything newer sucks for embedded use.

But it's not. The oldest one still maintained us 3.16 unless you're talking about currypatched ones from RH. Also, there are a great number of improvement in the latest versions (especially bufferbloat mitigation).

No, it's shit. Especially the 'muh gayman' button that purports to 'reduce lag' and doesn't even explain how it works.
No CFW, no WPA3 (will allegedly allow per-client credentials), EAP-PWD (allows per-client username and password with no CA needed), no buy.
Also wifi is more shit than ever thanks to FCC retards throwing a fit. Manufacturers obviously took the lazy way out by locking down their already pozzed firmware and hardcoding available channels and transmit powers. So if you're in the American continent but outside Burgerland, get fucked.
leddit spacing
I just wonder why the fuck there are no good QoS controls anywhere to stop bufferbloat. I wonder whether it's intentional on the part of (((consumer networking manufacturers))). I mean, a simple HTB qdisc, a few HTB classes, some fq_pie or fq_codel leaf qdiscs, and a few filters to classify flows would be enough for most people. Instead we get these shit opaque 'exclusive super gaymen qos' without any configurability or extendibility.

11 Gbps is the COMBINED THEORETICAL MAXIMUM BANDWIDTH of the THREE BANDS (you can only use 1 at a time). Actual performance won't ever come close to that number. They don't even specify the backplane speed the incorporated switch has (i.e. how much data per second it can actually handle) or the PPS (how many 64-byte packets can it pass). Then there's the routing speed (how much fucking bandwidth can it get from one network to another).
leddit spacing
Besides, if you use your router like that you will get more dropped packets than dropouts in college. Also your neighbors will hate you for using 160 MHz channel width (takes up 8 channels).

3 is bloat, 2.4 will always be the god-tier kernel revision. 2.6 is still maintained as you say.

oh yay
I can go and try to find a specific router now so I can try tomato because Tomato won't run on the routers that I have laying around...just so I can try out tomato would be nice though
too much effort right now and you're a faggot now for getting my mind latched onto this.

so I found my router's source code. it's likely on zip or tarball.
will i be able to disassemble the code and flash my router into a better firmware? it's a lte router and as far as I know there isn't any lte capable openwrt aside from bridging the lte usb dongle into the router's usb port which should give a terrible throughput.
should I go for the project?

If you can restore, definitely

invidio.us/watch?v=dXo54Au9x2Q
So excited for this paperweight. So much gay porn to download.

The AC band on my laptop is limited at 300.
The wifi is at 433.
I get 250 at the right spots so I just added a range extender that has the 5Ghz bands and changed my ISP's plan to a 300 line from the 1gig.

1 of ram gig even enough for 1/10th of a terabyte though?

hopefully you're running a wire to it to use it as an AP. Otherwise enjoy your halved data rate.

It's a residential router

What the fuck IS a big time router, anyways?

Attached: bigTimeRouter.jpg (1024x576, 133.23K)

Will it have WPA3?
invidio.us/watch?v=aPoe4WtX2mU

Attached: a0f5593f487e3db849cee71a0ac7750ae9aa35884452d2e8ef6afd5a66a83196.jpeg (896x672, 36.74K)

INTO THE TRASH IT GOES
Why the fuck would anyone want to use this when you can have per-user credentials with WPA2-Enterprise with EAP-PWD? I swear wifi standard bodies are doing this shit on purpose. I am beyond mad.

OpenBSD doesn't even have ac yet.

Jesus fucking christ. Just get yourself company routers if you're gonna cash out so hard, you dumbfuck.
ubnt.com/unifi/unifi-ap-ac-lr/

Attached: ffdb862a058e5092bea7e3fbf06d4c0eb82bb5c69112e02d958ebfdcbfd53034.png (326x309, 5.29K)

archive.is/91Muw
First 802.11ax router came out, not gay ming shit though.

Israel backdoored router, fuck yeah retard!

Where are the proofs?
I'm asking, because I'm looking at that post and they seem like the best option on range for me, what do you recommend?

Attached: You'll_like_slapping_it_at_least.gif (480x270, 263K)

Does anyone ITT actually have a justification or spending 700$ on a fucking wireless router? Is there even a justification for this? If you need range wouldn't you be farther ahead to set up a multi router system with some cheap routers that can run the firmware you want instead of blowing enough cash to actually build a competent desktop?

Are we just /g/ niggers now buying the most """high end""" shit because jamal gots to have his sheet lookin dank?

here is how stupid consumerfags are:

only good goyim use wifi, enjoy your brainfog and lowered testosterone

found another interesting one
web.archive.org/web/20021001142139/http://www.necmitsubishi.com:80/products/home/ProductDetail.cfm?product_id=159&division=NEC
$3800 for a 21" 1600x1200 LCD made before 2003
and it's likely to come with dead pixels:
slcentral.com/c/h/r/nec/lcd2110/page6.php

How do they hold up now?

# Copyright 2001-2003, Broadcom Corporation# All Rights Reserved.From the readme
correct me if im wrong, but this sounds like source available, not OSS.

i imagine they have terrible contrast, viewing angles, pixel density, and pixel response. i'd like to find some bigger 4:3/5:4 montitors though. the best i have are 19" from the mid 2000s. for CRTs it seems hard to get better than 20" viewable. i have some 20" IPS/PVA LCDs too but they have terrible input lag and pixel response and one even drops frames, and they all have grainy surfaces over the screen

AX is too early. If you want range, either modify a budget router combo with OpenWRT, tomato, etc or buy an industrial AP. It's right around the same bloody price as the 11000X anyways
Wait 2-3 years for ax by the way, unless you have a 10 fucking gigabit connection or something. If you have that though, you wouldn't be enough of a normalfag consumer faggot to get a shit tier overpriced router with more bugs embedded than pozpig convention.
ebay.com/sch/i.html?cmd=SKW&_nkw=ruckus r720&_sop=15
Ruckus 730 is coming too. Get it if you got deep wallets, are autistically obsessed over POTENTIAL data you'll never use and want "LE BEZT XDDD"
archive.is/8QLpc

Attached: Screenshot_20180711-021413_Lynx.jpg (1440x1417, 709.66K)

Thanks! I went with ubiquiti.

Wew

It's out, goyim!
archive.is/P2gCM

Ruckus is better.

everyone who uses wifi is a good fucking goyim, enjoy becoming a soyboy

Good post, have an unboat.

At that rate I could just adjust this shit myself.

Ruckus.

Aren't you worried about CP packets?

Shig.

If I were you I'd surely spend those on the upcoming 5G tech
Either you get the SIM exploit or phreak some shit.
Imagine just modifying your packets can already grant you access on anywhere assuming you found the IP ranges not blocked by the ISP, or the TTL trick with a SIM plan, even roaming hacks are a thing but I don't know that yet.

So the shibby fork is somehow "official tomato" now?

Tomato forks cannot fix the KRACK because of relying on the proprietary Broadcom blobs.

Do you have to hold at least triple CCIE these days to be let anywhere near those (given that CCENT is done in kindergarden, CCNA in grades school, and CCNP in high school these days by anyone who hopes for a career in networking)?

What is a worthy successor to ?
(Is it viable to still use it these days, or will it inevitably be taken over by local skids who will consider any old shitbox advertising 54Mbps max speed as an old vulnerable shitbox and therefore an easy target?)

How old are you? 14?

If he IS 14, he's definitely gotta hit me up. Ha ha

Attached: The-Chill-Jewfro.jpg (640x430, 47.35K)

Go look through networking job ads. "CCNP minimum, CCIE desired" is a recurring motif you'll keep stumbling upon.

Why do routers have to look so goddamn stupid nowadays.

Because the only people buying routers that aren't provided by the telecom service providers are gaymers.

tools are the same way, manufacturers spend all their money trying to make a piece of shit look like a transformer so that idiots buy it regardless of its performance or longevity. luckily unlike tools it's exceedingly easy to make a router which is A) better than any consumer router you can buy, B) will last you for ever, and C) is super cheap. Just buy a really nice wireless card put it in a garbage old computer and then install either one of the distro's made to turn a old PC into a router or do it yourself using openbsd or some other *nix derivative.

Except that a regular WLAN card is not optimized to function as an access point.

If you mean the wireless cards that come by default in a pc then yes, otherwise no. Just go on Wikidevi look for whatever router you want, look at the wireless chip it uses and 9 times out of 10 the wireless chip it uses is available in a pcie form factor.