I'm seriously considering switching to TempleOS now.
It's not like the Internet isn't also going down the toilet too.
The Cucking Continues: Linus Torvalds adopts the Contributor Covenant
Parker Gomez
Wyatt Thompson
I never said so. They are indeed worse.
Parker Nguyen
At least use KolibriOS fam
Brayden Stewart
I can only judge by following replies but it looks like you're
Eli Hill
They're not smart, else they wouldn't be called useful idiots. They're only "smart" in a very narrow sense that allows them to write (bad, stinky, insecure, bloated) code, but they don't possess the divine intellect.
Ayden Foster
I fucking knew a woman was the cause of this drivel.
Parker Flores
So by way of /v/ I have found out about Linus' change of mind and the adoption of this code of conduct. I have to admit as someone who barely keeps up with politics, much less of the OS I jumped to last year, I'm not really sure how I should be feeling about this. What specifically is wrong with the contributor covenant, or rather. Having read it and a couple articles warning of the political motivations behind it. How has it been utilized to erode or otherwise undermine the direction and/or leadership of a project.
I haven't exactly dug deep, but so far only the Opal project, and a couple articles outlining the slippery slope rhetoric of the Contributor's covenant have come up in my readings. And the number of projects that have adopted the Contributor's covenant seems small compared to how many projects I imagine exist with any prominence so I can only imagine that if Linux has adopted it, this will mean a larger number of projects as well.
So what is the over and under for this thing?
Matthew Jackson
But that doesn't happen, see OpenSSL
Lucas Nelson
It's a political infiltration, this is the equivalent of an enemy collapsing the wall of your castle. You can say "they aren't in yet" if you want to be a cuck, but that doesn't change the fact that your enemy removed the wall.
Easton Sanchez
...