maybe I got it all wrong but would this just make us more isolated and easy to control? We are all here now and we are here together but if was all decentralised to the max we would only be served an individual custom tailored version of internet that they see fit.
Distributed internet
Liam Miller
Dylan Flores
Chans aren't anonymous though.
Aiden Thompson
That and how do you prevent getting reputation bombed?
Just hope that you never post anything any group would not like?
Cooper Powell
Reputation systems do not work with anonymity, and are prone to sybil attacks. The only thing you can really do is whitelisting identities, and via this form groups. But that's very tedious. Just add spam protection, I'd recommend simple proof of work, or, if you feel a need for environmental protection, tinker with proofs of space.
Noah Richardson
...
Lucas Sullivan
Urbit addresses this via keeping a set amount of identities.
Wasting identities are expensive.
Parker Sullivan
Maybe Tor, I2P, Freenet are better than Urbit.
Cooper Thompson
Interview with an Urbit engineer.
youtube.com
Aiden Jackson
If control of the physical infrastructure isn’t changed then all of this P2P/Decentralised bullshit is meaningless. We need a distributed wireless network to replace our current infrastructure.
Eli Diaz
so-called distributed web is the next stage in total control of human beings
if you support it, I hope you find yourself in a gulag under the coming police state