So you want us to have a CoC?

no fuck you CoCs are retarded

If you talk to liberals about religion, they'll claim you're a rube for being Christian, but if you bring up how Muslims are incredibly violent/antediluvian they'll freak out ("wow, just wow!") and the conversation ends there. They can't explain why Muslims/Islam are good, but they still want them to immigrate.

Old style forums and most developer communities have fared pretty well without those "codes of conduct" for decades; only recently there has been a push by some activists to impose those things on communities, often without being a part of it, even sometimes as their very first interaction with those communities. That approach to policing tells you enough about their real interests: they aren't about helping the community in any way.
That has been possible because those at the top have always had the power to ban anyone for any reason at all. And that's what matters, not a laundry list of sacred cows.
Don't shit where you eat? Of course those activists don't shit where they eat: it's only rarely when someone in the development team pushes for things like this, and when it is, is often because the project itself is backed by a company with a "diversity manager", whatever that means.

The real agenda behind most of those documents, specially when they allow for anonymous accusations, hidden investigations, and other kafkaesque procedures, AND SPECIALLY when they potentially apply in places beyond project spaces, is to ban any criticism of things like unhealthy eating habits, immigration, non-christian religions, and the every changing definitions of transsexualism and the "gender" neologism. They'll try real hard to ban any mention of biological differences between sexes, that the "gender" neologism is something that was pushed by John Money and his depraved experiments, that gender originally meant to a characteristic of some words in spanish (e.g. "toalla" ends in "a": feminine gender; "caballo" ends in "o": masculine gender) and had nothing to with sex or "differences between brain chemistry and genitals", etc.

This is because if you think about it a little, it's obvious that the ever emerging terms like separating "gender" in "gender identity" and "gender expression" are just ways of accommodating their cognitive dissonance (e.g. gender is like sexual preference: it's hardwired in the brain vs. gender is something fluid, a feeling, and so it can change freely vs. gender is a social construct, it's mostly about the stereotypical behavior expected from males and females). And if you're able to discuss freely about it, then you can get other people to think too. The thing is so fucking stupid that even when there's a worldwide push to accept it as a fact (it's discussed as it already were, actually), it's needed to silence any contrary opinion as bigoted and transphobic, otherwise people will begin asking questions, and learn that's nothing like alternative sexual preferences, which is clearly defined and it affects only those who partake in it. The "T" in LGBT is out of place.

I could go on, pointing the times where people have been banned for wrongthink because CoCs, or the many other times where they literally say "I'm so-and-so from project" and then spew hate, and then nothing happens. But this is Zig Forums enough.

Brainlet.

Attached: online moderators.jpeg (600x339, 51.59K)

no, see, you should get a CoC because it reduces conflict
as demonstrated by all the conflict we don't have about CoCs themselves.

nigger forums have been filled with SJW faggots for like 20 years now. nerds love to adhere to various rules like "no saying nigger"

Nobody cares, christcuck. Go eat a semtic dick.

Ok, bud.

Attached: pope.jpg (1400x932, 362.12K)

Theres your problem.

That's all a moderation problem though, has nothing to do with conducts but instead with the way they interpret them.