The Holocaust - Speeches Question

Polite golf clap, building to steady applause.
Legitimate question. Tbh I look forward to seeing who calls you out first. That person is more (((suspect))) than you are.

I look at it like this: we're 70 years into a protracted D&C campaign against the white middle class. So corporate CEOs can get their bonuses, seeing as they have a Jewish front man to deflect any criticism.

All discussions like this get us closer to the truth, pending derailment or deletion.

I think a lot of it comes from actual audio recordings although when and where seems to be a mystery. The problem is people obsess about wording as if the wording implies a genocide and not the other evidence. Whether or not they ever had plans whether it was Plan A or Plan Z to kill the jews the proof clearly states no such deliberate plan was put in action whatsoever with the exception of some cases near the end of the war and even then that might only be 10's of thousands nowhere close to millions.

It's funny because what hangs people up the most seems to be "liquidate" as if that single time used implies a deliberate plan to gas the kikes to death. It does not. Liquidate through such a narrow idiotic lens of course could mean something like that. But when you say liquidate your assets you're not implying burning them to the ground, destroying them, or what have you. You're simply implying getting rid of.

I'm looking at the 30, Jan 1942 quote from Hitler. Interestingly, the Wikipedia quote leads to a sketchy site where the quote isn't even the same. Here's the quote from the source site:
Notice the ending, a slight difference but an interesting change nonetheless.
In addition, the site provides a video of the speech, but it's only two and a half minutes long, and is talking about how cold it is for the soldiers and general war stuff. Nothing of the supposed quote.

When it comes to Wikipedia for any honest quotes on the subject that isn't towing the mainstream line they deliberately have these slight 'misinterpretations', and they do this on purpose. It's an age old trick we've seen for decades on the history channel and via school documentaries where you can view on YouTube these comparisons.

If all you have is a few occasions where they spoke harshly of the jews that's not really confirming anything. ALTHOUGH, to be fair you have to see perhaps at the end of the war if they won it they would've come to the conclusion that they need to be exterminated and not deported due to them starting the war and causing the loss of tens of millions of lives. The Second World War and all its deaths can be attributed to the jewish race without question. If it wasn't for their involvement it simply would not have happened. Don't feed me this poor jew at the bottom bullshit either because for 3,000 years the poor jew at the bottom hasn't been policing his elite jews orchestrating their annihilation time and time again. All that tells me about the good bottom of the barrel jew is that he's a coward and not deserving of life or respect to simply kvetch for all eternity while never risking life and limb for the greater good.

Hmmm, well, that's strange.

The first 'source' for this is "holocaust-history.org", which, we'll look at that in a moment.
>web.archive.org/web/20080314131150/http://holocaust-history.org/der-ewige-jude/hitler-19390130.shtml
But its weird, it doesn't say QUITE what the wikikpedia says…

WIKI:Today I want to be a prophet once more: if international Jewry succeeds in plunging the nations into another world war, the result will not be the Bolshevization of the earth, and thereby the victory of Jewry, but the destruction of the Jewish race in Europe!

HH: If the international finance-Jewry inside and outside Europe should succeed in plunging the nations into a world war yet again, then the outcome will not be the victory of Jewry, but rather the annihilation of the Jewish race in Europe!

Well, not that far off I guess. Here it is in German, in case you were interested.
HH - GERMAN: Wenn es dem internationalen Finanzjudentum in und außerhalb Europas gelingen sollte, die Völker noch einmal in einen Weltkrieg zu stürzen, dann wird das Ergebnis nicht der Sieg des Judentums sein, sondern die Vernichtung der jüdischen Rasse in Europa!

The first point I'd raise here is… I don't see Hitler saying ANYTHING approximate to "If X, then WE WILL DO Y". Think about what he's saying here: "I'm telling you guys, if the Jews create another world war, its gonna result in their extinction."
I don't think that quite amounts to anything GENUINELY supporting of the idea of a plan being implemented years later to exterminate the Jews, do you? I mean, I'd probably say that too about the Jews (makes sense, no?), doesn't mean I'd be planning - or morally/ethically willing to take part in - an extermination program gassing women and children, Jew or otherwise.
Also, keep context in mind here dude: The Jews started boycotting Germany in 1933. You're talking about a speech from 1939, January.
September 1st 1939 was when Germany invaded Poland, September 3rd 1939 the UK and France declared war on Germany (nominally to protect Polish sovereignty, THE SINGLE GREATEST POINT OF THIS CONFLICT; see: Post-Yalta Poland). So, at this point, a EUROPEAN war has already started, is several months deep, and the Jews are trying to get everyone they can into the war…

All that said, those sources are… Dubious, lets put it that way. But I found the audio, and in fact, the full transcipt (albeit, no citation available in terms of where its drawn from, but perhaps its considered 'commons' by this point).
Lets take a look, starting after Uncle A has already been at it awhile…

...

I would be more interested to see the original German, if such a speech even exists. As I said, I do find it very concerning that the supposed video source doesn't even contain the quoted section. A slight change in words can make it into a completely different meaning. Anyway, most of the time quotes like this are a wild goose chase, but I feel satisfied that even the worst quotes they can come up with can be easily explained especially when taking into account historical evidence as I pointed out here.

Repeating the last line for reiteration:
>>Either the Jews will have to adjust to constructive, respectable activities, such as other people are already engaged in, or, sooner or later, they will succumb to a crisis of yet inconceivable proportions.


>Once again I will be a prophet: should the international Jewry of finance (Finanzjudentum) succeed, both within and beyond Europe, in plunging mankind into yet another world war, then the result will not be a Bolshevization of the earth and the victory of Jewry, but the annihilation (Vernichtung) of the Jewish race in Europe. Thus, the days of propagandist impotence of the non-Jewish peoples are over.

From what I can see, in that first quote, with context intact, Hitler is saying thusly:
"We do not want a war. The Jews do want a war. We want peace, and do not want to see a war merely for the sake of the Jews seeking revenge on us for deposing them of power in our lands. Others will surely see this, and they will be off put by the notion of going to war for the sake of these foreign people who parasitize off of them. Thus, I will predict: if the Jews start a world war, it will not be the victory of the Jewish-made Bolshevism, but the destruction of the Jews themselves!"

Let's see what's next…

The video I embedded actually is an old video that has part of the speech as its spoken. If someone speaks german they can translate how accurate it is to the text both on the video and presented here for comparisons. The audio paints a very different picture along with tone inflection change how its presented. Basically like reading a wall of text online and how it can be misinterpreted compared to a 5 second audio explanation. Speeches compared to the radio broadcast were the same way back then.