Oh, right, first: that holocaust-history.org site.
Lets have a look.
>phdn.org
Bunch of Jews and shabbos, mostly the former. When I want an unbiased discussion of something, the last place 'm going to go is a bunch of Jewish academics and European shabbos journalists, and I don't think thats an unfair position.
You understand the complete lack of actual evidence for the holocaust though correct?
Like the speeches are the only uncertainty for you?
I want you to think of it this way - if none of the evidence is solid, substantial, or truthful then why are the wordings of speeches meant to imply of course the routing of organized international Jewry from Germany causing you this doubt that the holocaust is in fact falsehood?
The recording is unconfirmed to this day and is the only thing Simon Wiesenthal Center dudes still feel confident posting on cuckchan Zig Forums since there's no real way to confirm nor refute it unless someone could find recordings of Himmler's voice which may or may not exist otherwise.
I can guarantee you a speech would not consist of that line you excerpted though.
Now this one is interesting, in that it seems to reference the previous one in a sense.
Nothing there about "We're going to do this" or "We should do this", only "This is happening". Fits appropriately with the previous passage.
Well, yes, it would be very important… Hmm, I wonder if thats the right word.
Let's see…
But it can no longer be halted. It must only be guided in the right direction.
Ignore that last bit.
Oh, okay, well, the reference here is a "permanent dead link".
>research.calvin.edu
Weird how that hasn't been removed, given there's no longer an applicable cited source…
I found it though.
>research.calvin.edu
I'm going to repost this whole thing, because its good, and its got amazing context - especially for Current Year +3.99
I'll need to find the German transcript in a moment, but we'll get to that in a sec.
(He was right, you know.)
...
(If he's talking about the extermination of the Jewish people, how can victory be said to have occurred in 1943?)
...
Seems pretty obvious here that he's not talking about some plan for Germany to exterminate the Jewish people in camps with ridiculous gas chambers, but rather, that he is propagandistically speaking in the context of an enemy one is engaged with and expressing that they must be rent from power, hence the line about "victory" in Germany in 1943. How else could such a line be interpreted, really, given the timeframe in question? Surely nobody is going to pretend that in Germany the Jews were being genocided - its widely acknowledged that the only still-claimed "death camps" were all in the East, in Poland, so that simply wouldn't make any sense at all.
Not having any luck in finding German version of “Der Krieg und die Juden" from whence that bit comes, unfortunately, so I cant get more into the potentiality of translational errors/purposeful politically-motivated mistranslation.
Doesn't really matter though, the point stands: If Goebbels is talking about "victory" in Germany in 1943 in the context of the Jews, he's clearly NOT talking about having exterminated them, rather, them having been removed from power.
Anyway, I did 2/4, you can - and should - examine the other two in similar detail and share your findings.
Oh, wait, nevermind, I see the word "Posen" there, and I have to say something about it.