get off my dick already, you illiterate zealot. you jumped on me and called me "eurocommunist" and "revisionist" without knowing anything about me in terms of ideology, quoted me with things i never said and then you whine when i snap back at you. fuck you.
European Union
Laws are proposed by the European Commission though which is just a bunch of porkies and are allowed to resubmit a rejected law to the Parliament again and again until they are forced to pass it.
the EU can be taken or left but unless your aim is a united states of europe the euro needs to DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE, it's completely indefensible economic ineptitude to have a shared currency without shared fiscal policy.
the EU itself is anti-left in that the fundamental assumptions underlying it only hold true under capitalism.
why, under Europe-wide socialism, would there be a hard border between France and Germany? There wouldn't - okay - so why do we need the EU to ensure free movement of goods, services and labour? Those things would be quite natural without any organisation.
It is quite plausible that there would be some kind of European Union, but it's equally possible it would be a lowkey organisation like the Scandinavian Union or Celtic League
Shit, i guess Britain should just rename itself to the Very United Kingdom so that it automatically leave the EU and all agreement are null. You just solved all problems what a legend.
you are new here, aren't you?
Im not even new. Maybe a full on Europe wide revolution could do something with the EU, but the suggestion that if the EU renamed its self to the ESU somehow all previous international arrangements would just cease to exist is ridiculous and an extraordinary oversimplification.
Also just saying "revolution" as if that's an argument in its self is anarkidde tier.
shitposting flag obviously
The reef is not exclusively Roman. In this case it respresents prosperity. Question is, what's wrong with either prosperity or Rome? Rome was the largest, most progressive Empire for a long time. Regions living under Roman rule enjoyed prosperity never-before-seen for hundreds of years. It was the fall of Rome in the first place that created feudalism and then capitalism after that. With this historical knowledge in mind, was Rome ever really that bad compared to the world that came after it?
comrade, except that is pretty much how it works by international law. If USA had a revolution and people's uprising would tell that USA no longer exist, we are USSA now, they would start from point zero - every single agreement between country X and United States of America would be invalid because no such country as USA exist anymore. No debts would have to be payed and all trade agreements would have to be renegotiated.
Sure, there are some conditions which have to be met, like it really needs to be a revolution not just ruling party coup and so on.