Why is the left so big on censorship?

You don't know what you don't know. The depth of your ignorance knows no bounds.

It's not censorship, it's quality control. The lack of censorship in modern society is precisely why everything in culture is trash;
Movies are thoughtless, mindless CG garbage or liberal bullshit
Games are mindless shooters or otherwise some other unintelligent fallacious life simulator
Books are boring repetitions of far better older stories or are just fanfictions and fetishes being published
Music is just screaming plugged through auto-tune.

Why? Because quality control is 0, due to the "magic of the market" delusion.

Again, strawman. Plenty of capable, educated people stayed. Only those who could not continue their living based on extracting wealth from others were protesting.

Those who earned wealth through cooperation with others stayed. Those who used institutions like private property to extract wealth in non-productive manner were justly ousted.

There was also distortion. It was wrong to persecute small farmers who lended small piece of land while they were working themselves. Only those who earned their entire living from non-productive extraction, like rent, were in a minority and were naturally thought of as vampires.

I hope it served them a lesson in humility and put them towards productive life, when they viewed in the same way they used to view their local countrymen.

Proofs?

I’ve heard this line before, but only from older burgers. From what I’ve heard from people who actually lives in the eastern bloc, it wasn’t that different from anywhere else, where you essentially choose a career path in school and where you end up is based on how you score.

It's PERSUE your dreams you moron.

What country was this exactly? Force to become a carpenter my ass. What year, what country, what age were these people? CONTEXT motherfucker, your story is less than anecdotal.

I know you're hoping that you can conveniently explain me away so that you can go back to your socialist echo chamber, but Freedom is ethical. Slavery is not ethical.

No, communism isn't slavery. They Citizens all work for each other and they all have an economy, and we take the "toxic" access wealth they've accumulated and appropriate it for their own good.

They whole communist explanation of how the world works is like an over simplified cartoon.

"Greedy people are using you to earn money!"

It is a toxic negative falsehood. There are freaks in our population that are extraordinarily productive. They aren't 10,000 more time productive than the common person. No, there pay isn't proportional to their actual work value, but these people are rare. They do things like gather genius computer nerds together to create a tech company. Was Steve Jobs some predatory Sociopath?

There is a difference in being an artist on literal 9 to 5 and being a bohemian artist because of passive income like rent or surplus from private property.

People were studying at art schools in plenty of communist countries to do 9 to 5 making paintings, designing artworks for public buildings, designing new buildings. Industrial design, design of common places like railway stations, creation of art for the common places and so on. It also takes an artist to design and make wood carvings or plaster ornaments on buildings.

And again the nuance here is that when the system was failing, it got distorted and it was wrong to deny someone chance at doing something they want and be productive just because of their background and ancestry. It was clearly wrong how many were told to not study what they want because of what their parents did.

Agreed upon by whom? I keep hearing that it's agreed upon (mostly by liberal college professors) yet I have yet to see the same numbers in any one source. Not to mention that it statistically makes no fucking sense, and historians who were dedicated to studying these "victims" stated that these numbers are far too excessive, see Zemskov, Naumov, Getty etc.
*fixed it for you
Argument level 90 right there.

*pursue actually.

Why did the Soviet Union collapse?