Atrocities

Attached: c984267e10b8f0e495414ed4ffd64b248c77430e9ea16eb692bde214be5d1d32.png (800x2449 83.04 KB, 819.79K)

Very easy, in fact. You see, calling something an "atrocity" is merely a question of purely subjective assessment. If you think about it, you don't dislike communism because it committed atrocities. You classify some events as atrocities of communism because you dislike it.

Here is an example. Capitalist corporate media talked non-stop about Soviet Union's and Red China's plagues of Hunger - which were, of cause, caused by Communism. But they Completely ignore the very same events happened in the same time frame happening on the regular both in those countries (Just before the victory of revolution), Europe (Irish famine) and third world nations (too much to even list) on the regular.

It is obvious that "atrocities" is not an argument at all. In fact, reactionaries did the very same thing (and some braindead cretins do that still) in regards to liberalism, after the French Revolution was crushed.

Attached: 6f785450468e16b662dade68de11e76326c5d6ee.png (400x433, 272.94K)

he's talking about the peasants in those countries… getting killed off. I can't speak much about cambodia, vietnam and china, but it is incredibly stupid to try and deny that something went seriously wrong in the way the russians treated the peasants in the early 1930s

Are saying because they supported communism they in no why would be harmed by its system?

If you could provide any resources for these claims I would greatly appreciate it.

Any movement can very easily turn against their supporters

Sause

I guess I should make it known considering the replies I am not capitalist.

1.You are right I do dislike communism.
2.The holodomor, great leap forward, the killing field created by Khmer Rouge, pitesti experiments, and the cultural revolution weren't famine they were designed to kill and get rid of people the government's didn't like.

Which is merely your preference to classify them as such, borne from dislike of communism. As we do not dislike communism, those things do not bother us.

Holodomor and Great Leap Forward and cultural revolution weren't designed to kill anyone. They were emergency responses to the enviromental and systematic problems and crises faced by the respective nations, and finally overcame by them, as both Russian and Chinese Communists created and abundance of food for their people and solved the threat of famine forever.

Khmer Rouge was a failed state, supported by Capitalist block, and there are 100 times more Capitalist failed states than communist ones.

It should be clear for you, that you simply "pardon" the (100s times bigger) casualties of reactionary Liberalism as "just natural causes" and explicitly pin casualties of Communism as deliberately caused.

Attached: 1483438642925.jpg (225x225 159.73 KB, 13.05K)