Anyone active over at Zig Forums?

In literally what way.

How many times do I have to tell you we aren't talking about militia groups loyal to Mao? Obviously they kept their guns because their purpose was to go around and keep the peasants in check. It has nothing to do with private gun ownership. It was banned for the vast majority of the regular populace.


The difference is that there is an arbiter for resolving disputes and that can be taken to court. There are actually laws and regulations in place, as well as protections. Not the same as a blanket ban on private businesses and property. For fucks sake, Self-employed Cuban farmers cannot sell their own produce at a price higher than what the state sets it at to generate a profit.

If the common prole could own guns easily, you'd experience far greater resistance. Kulaks had their grain confiscated easily and unable to resist because they lacked arms.

Meanwhile the most right-wing authoritarian nation made guns far easier to acquire for the vast majority of the populace. Like I said, acquistion of rifles and shotguns were completely deregulated. No license needed. Nor an NSDAP member. You could be a closet Marxist who kept it to himself, and stock up on an arsenal and as long as you kept your mouth shut, the authorities would be none the wiser. That simply could never happen in a nations like the USSR and Maoist China, etc, as these nations were even more authoritarian when it came to personal freedom than the Nazis ever were. Marxist regimes need a complete monopoly on force to maintain power and their policies.

The USSR literally did. Hunting longarms were sold without a license. There were laws that said state enterprises should make better guns for personal ownership. Party members and members of the military (of which there were millions) additionally had access to handguns. Also there of course existed marksmaship courses that were freely accessible and encouraged, why would an ebil gun-grabbing state have anything like the Voroshilov Sharpshooters? Soviet gun confiscations all happened in wartime when guns were needed at the front and it was necessary to disarm spies and saboteurs.

Nazi doesn't know shit so he just regurgitates stale american conservative propaganda while pretending to be a rebel. Sad! Many such cases.

Nigga we literally had a massive shitfest over this last month, can we not do this again?

Disarming Nazis and arming socialist security forces is good, actually.

Attached: nva3.jpg (620x413, 94.19K)

It’s a problem a lot of people share. It’s why we need leftyk

Now would be the worst time to grab guns. You ☭TANKIE☭s better seize the means first before you go trying to disarm a nation.

Attached: e0392a06074888b6746a99079dfbe0edff1b9121a9ae0f3b43d3000a1380adaa.gif (500x374, 1.45M)

This guy gets it. OP gets it. Y'all need a /leftyk/ where you can talk about funs and hog hunting. Then you need to go use your hard earned capitalist money to prepare for glorious revolution.

Attached: porky is afraid.jpg (388x408, 20.57K)

Did nazi germany or fascist Italy allow left wing militias all over the place? Nope.
Guns for personal usage such as hunting, where also allowed, and most of the gun laws now set in place are from the deng era and onwards.