Alright, now the President is out of the picture, so all further advice applies to the proletariat only.
Politically Confused user Here
personally i don't think capitalism is a necessary part of rapid, non-centralized industrial development. what's necessary is instead free enterprise, which is usually overused by capitalists and libertarians to mean that its an inherent part of capitalism. but a group of workers deciding that they'll open their own steel mill over some rich bourgeois prick deciding the same has nothing to do with the capitalist system; capitalism only creates more rich bourgeois pricks and represses the workers into economic slavery.
The leftist agenda is giving the masses freedom and power in society instead of allowing the capitalists to hoard it all.
Yes. A long term eradication of the worldwide dictatorship of capital is as viable as it gets for the world's masses.
I couldn't care less, I support the campaign against him even if the woman is lying. He is an extreme reactionary and we should support all available means to prevent him from gaining power.
Exactly.
Capitalist society is controlled by money-hungry psychopaths, which makes it incredibly alienating and unforgiving. I contrast, communists want to replace private ownership of infrastructure, profit-seeking, wage slavery, police, and prisons with decentralized, democratically-controlled production, mutual aid, and restorative justice in order to build a society that will meet everyone's needs efficiently while respecting their individual autonomy. In short, economic self-interest, empathy for your fellow proles, and a chance to stop or even reverse some of the ecological damage caused by capitalism.
I think on a 30+ year timescale
of course
Wealth is literally made up on computers now.
Why do you think cognitive dissonance is a blessing?
Except I know zero lefties that live in areas where they don't rely on 10 strangers for their needs. Do you even know your needs from wants?
The idea your argument includes generalities, it's circular logic.
So you're pro-time wasting and interfering in others ways. How liberal of you. Maybe government will get around to taking care of you when your friends stop getting in the way. So much for your anti-disinformation ideals.
What are you even trying to say? Take your meds.
What? Is this some "all lefties are welfare queens" strawman? I legitimately have no idea what you are talking about.
Is this sentence missing a preposition somewhere? And there is no circular logic in what you've quoted.
No, I just don't care about the spectacle and retarded American celebrity-show politics.
How do you expect us to respond to this? You are not even criticizing any of our values or theories, you are simply stating that you dislike us personally based on negative experiences with random people we don't know about. You are shaming some vague caricature of a stereotype of liberals that don't even share our views.
Do you even believe in anything at all? Or is your concept of politics analogous to high school clique drama?
The fact that you can ask this is proof of your cognitive dissonance in how you think you believe in something you don't practice.
I'm not going to teach someone American English to have a conversation with them. If you lack the foundation to hold this conversation, same applies.
Do you know what cognitive dissonance, generalities, and mincing words are?
Joke or not, you inferring I need meds is proof you're here to stir the pot and not open to the idea you could be wrong. "A fool takes no pleasure in understanding, but only in expressing his opinion." J
Any of your angry protestors do anything but 'earn money' and rely on a system to barter money for the things they need? I don't know any democrats that farm for a living or any that are self-sufficient. They might earn enough money to buy what they want or need today, but none that have gotten to a point where retirement looks comfortable.
It ends with a fucking generality, that's where your logic comes full circle! "I think we have the tech to fix our problems, but I'm not sure" is circular logic. Just because you minced the words 'if not all' and missed it doesn't mean we're all going to.
You need someone outside your nonsense to point it out.
Please read the post above you. What the hell are you going on about?