The Soviet Union Was Not Fucking Imperialist

*under communist rule

This is a liberal idea and is wrong. A socialist state has the right to invade and liberate any non-socialist state. All capitalist states are fiefdoms of the bourg and are much more like prisons than governments.

but the hungarian revolution was anti-Khrushchev, not anti-communist.

...

Attached: hungarians.jpg (1200x836, 147.99K)

If that was true, "revolutionaries" wouldn't be hunting down and killing those who fought alongside Bolsheviks in 1918. Moreover, workers would've supported them. However, they didn't. Moreover, students and kids were used as cannon fodder - which has never been hallmark of Communist revolution.

the revolution was first and foremost an opposition to the USSR's government policies; not the fact that they were communist. Are you forgetting the fact that Imre Nagy himself identified as communist?

and what are you citing as your source for all these "facts"?

it was imperialism by definition because the only reason Khrushchev invaded was because they threatened to leave the Warsaw pact. or is using military for economic gain not imperialism?

Nope, nor was economic gain Khruschev's main concern

his main concern was undoing everything Stalin had done to put the USSR on the course of becoming another generic neoliberal state (which it did).