IMT vs DSA

The IMT convinced the unofficial Democrat Cops of America Spokesman Bhaskar Sunkara into a debate on socialism.
Can someone redpill me on the IMT?
How do they differ from other Trots?

facebook.com/events/701801600192958/

Attached: imt world school.jpg (673x425, 47.18K)

Other urls found in this thread:

marxist.com/
marxist.com/syria-from-revolution-to-counter-revolution-how-it-happened-and-why-a-reading-guide.htm
marxist.com/syria-the-barbarism-of-war-and-imperialist-hypocrisy.htm
marxist.com/syria/
marxist.com/marxist-theory-and-the-struggle-against-alien-class-ideas.htm
reddit.com/r/Canadian_Socialism/comments/89ihkj/socialist_fightback_banned_from_cupe_3903_picket/
facebook.com/socialistrevolutionIMT/videos/479380842555594/
facebook.com/socialistrevolutionIMT/videos/508727586278858/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

What is the debate supposed to be

Technically not a debate but in Philly the IMT is advertising it as a debate via word of mouth.

Live debates are pseudo-intellectualist bullshit. They don't accomplish anything.

I'm not particularly familiar with the American branch of the IMT but they're my preferred tendency so i'm interested in what this debate is going to actually be about.
Simply put the IMT are orthodox trots, their roots are with Militant, that is the entryists in Labour who were in control of Liverpool city council and got purged by Kinnock because we live in the doomed timeline where Benn didn't win the deputy leadership because of the traitor unions. The IMT were thrown out as a faction from the CWI in the 90s over the CWI's rejection of entryism. The central figure in the IMT was Ted Grant who broke with the Fourth International over their degeneration and surrender to petite-bourgeois trends, particularly idpol.
They're very concerned with theory and history, anti-idpol, anti-anarkiddie upholders of Bolshevism. The current leading theorist of the IMT is Alan Woods who is a very nice welsh man who was friends with Hugo Chavez who read his books and for a while took advice from him. However Woods criticised and still criticises Chavez for trying to 'carry out half a revolution' and not pushing all the way through which is why Venezuela is in the situation it is in now. He's not a big fan of Maduro but still has hope for the Venezuelan working class being capable of carrying out the Bolivarian revolution to its conclusion.
The IMT's main website is here marxist.com/

Attached: Alanwoodsconhugochavez.jpg (300x291, 23.36K)

So the PSL defends North Korea and the IMT defends Venezuela.

ehh.. I guess it is a defense of venezuela from imperialism but its critical support and opposed to Maduro's policies as constant concessions to the bourgeoisie.

Attached: alan_woods.jpg (640x476, 200.02K)

Is this some sort of third-rate Thomas Sankara?

Petite-bourgeois American-Indian, owner of a small social democratic media conglomerate.

I think it's also worth noting that the CWI has a tendency to support national liberation movements and self-determination while the IMT generally rejects it as bourgeois. For instance, the CWI supported Catalan independence while the IMT opposed it.

What is their logic in opposing self-determination?

Would the IMT support a United Syria over the municipalist project one big US military base in Syria?

How is it a debate when they are functionally on the same side?

AFAIK, it's the IMT's interpretation of internationalism. All nationalist movements are bourgeois in their eyes and independence movements are a distraction.

Their position on Syria seems to be "both sides are bad, but FSA and their imperialist backers are worse"
marxist.com/syria-from-revolution-to-counter-revolution-how-it-happened-and-why-a-reading-guide.htm
marxist.com/syria-the-barbarism-of-war-and-imperialist-hypocrisy.htm

Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.

Here's some accessible stuff they've written on the topic
marxist.com/syria-from-revolution-to-counter-revolution-how-it-happened-and-why-a-reading-guide.htm
marxist.com/syria-the-barbarism-of-war-and-imperialist-hypocrisy.htm
They have a whole syria section on their website
marxist.com/syria/

fuggg

Attached: joseb sdalin xDDDD.png (616x606, 13.73K)

I'm naturally suspicious of Trotskyists but this seems reasonable

I mean that the IMT's wing in England and Wales is Socialist appeal: which is a Labour insular group. As far as British trots go, they are actually pretty good (and believe me, I hate british trots).
Don't make me dream britrotanon, it makes me feel.
Also who wants to know a meme? So Bhaskar Sunkara recently bought and reopened Tribune: the UK's Democratic Socialist paper of Orwell, Foot, and Bevan fame. So this is effectively a fight between Militant Tendency and Tribune, but in America. What an age, ladies and gents, what an age.

The Labour Party is a party of neoliberalism.
You cannnot renew either the Democrats or Labour.

Trot's obsession with coopting other movements is parasitic and this is the main reason why no one likes trots.

When was the last time a neoliberal party had a marxist as its chancellor-in-waiting?
The democrats were founded as a party of the slave-owning aristocracy in the South, Labour was founded as a means to express the proletarian trade union movement. At their cores, one is founded on the elite, the other on the working class. Now you can argue about imperialism, or it's 1990s years: but to say Corbyn or the reinvigorated is anything but legitimately democratic socialist is factually incorrect.

Attached: abc5820a2318b16aa828b7056b9857101d3cb4e78483757831a16528c06e2f95.jpg (1200x625, 118.12K)

labour was a compromise between socialist unions and bourgeois trade unions, as Lenin noted.

What were the bourgeois trade unions he identified in the pre-war period? Just interested.

Trade union consciousness is not working class consciousness.

When are you from, 2000s?

Attached: e9396a533c1c51d36cced8329c3f3e590bcf4e02681d8235526954cc4e34272d.png (1137x640, 897.41K)

It's sad that people still believe in the parliamentary road to socialism.

A tank cannot drive down a country lane, nor can a bicycle on a motorway: different conditions require different methods.

Is that a quote from Eduard Bernstein?

No it's something I pulled out my arse.

Sounds like typical Trotsky rationale for betraying Marxism.

read 'where is britain going?' you faggots

Wish I could go to this, I'll be at work when its happening. Would be interesting to see.

Only thing I know about the IMT is that they have a silly slogan about nationalizing only the biggest 500 companies or something like that.

Yet both a tank and a bicycle can fit inside your ass.

Attached: d2u6nxRGA6qPQD-vFxsmPvaE9FqMAeeTe_B6Lr96Urc.png (550x400, 258.11K)

Commanding heights, it is nicked from Benn's AES, which in turn was based on Attlee's premiership.

Have a feeling this is gonna be a huge wank contest and a complete waste of time.

"Debates" like this tend to be: you don't win over the proletariat by debate,s you win them over by improving their conditions.

Actually a pretty good take. Wtf I love Trots now.

IMT position on identity politics:

Marxism vs Identity Politics
marxist.com/marxist-theory-and-the-struggle-against-alien-class-ideas.htm

IMT here, who else going?

Wow my first time seeing another IMT comrade on Zig Forums. I'll be watching the livestream.

(me)
Are you in Philly?

Attached: 2ca739f36b2cf094dea186ee8cc28ba4bf402206156d0a17aff268cc80436311.png (1048x645, 392.51K)

They're like any other Trot group. They are insistent that only they have the correct interpretation of Marxism and it's their job to take over the Democrat Cops of America after it collapses. They are typical entryists.
They use sex, love bombing, and other culty tactics to recruit very active Democrat Cops of America members into joining the IMT.
Then they have dual membership. This has happened in chapters like Pittsburgh and Philadelphia. I hear that they're trying similar things in Brooklyn.

Are you gay?

Even if you are gay, the IMT will offer you queer bait to suck you into their Trotsky cult.

...

Sign me up

Hot Trots are waiting to suck YOUR dick RIGHT NOW

Can confirm, am IMT incubus. hmu

Attached: sozialismusistsexy.jpg (966x1152, 241.27K)

Stupid sexy Trots. Seriously though, why are all the Trots within reach so fucking cultish?

most left-wing parties be they trots, maotists or mls are 'cultish', its a consequence of being small insular groups. There was a whole big thread about it a while ago.

Yeah, but Bob Avakian-tier?

well yeah, maoists tend to be on a whole other level of crazy

Attached: F1AC4A13-2D68-42FB-B05C-FD87534A73F0.png (728x392, 84.62K)

True.

nearby, going to NERMS?

Most of the time, they don't bother to fuck you, especially if you're new to socialism. They simply give you a lot of positive reinforcement.
They only fuck you if they
1.Find you genuinely sexually attractive.
2. They see you as politically useful for their organization.

They also fuck each other a lot and that causes a lot of drama internally.

tl;dr - CIA vs FBI

There was this dream I had before about cops killing each other. It started with q couple of cops helping a guy who was just in a bad accident he was on the ground bleeding but alive. Then another pig comes in and starts shooting him just because the first two cops start shooting the third and then another cop shows up and starts shooting the three of them. A whole chain reaction of red bacon grease everywhere ends with every cop dead by "friendly fire" .

looks like the FBI picked up on this thread /sigh

Isn't that the strategy of every university based Leninist sect?

The PSL defends both Venezuela and DPRK and has a line similar to on Maduro

Wish I could. I am in Washington and that would be a lot of travel. Hope it goes well.

A Trot is 99% of the time an acceptable "radical" liberal, and the Democrat Cops of America are just acceptable radical liberals. Fuck them and their debate, I hope they both get fisted.
Why would anyone care about this dumb shit? What could they POSSIBLY say of ANY importance?!

>tfw no qt gf (male) to sell newspapers with and love bomb me
Feels unreal, comrades

Attached: 1540853904.jpg (675x492, 37.37K)

lmao, this board is ten times more red lib than the IMT, stop talking shit

t. IMT newspaper boy

online editor actually, checkmate

Attached: smugs.png (379x551, 179.53K)

For the US section?

Surely you jest!

Attached: DbAknirWAAE4Ic5.jpeg (1200x600, 32.55K)

obviously memeing you dips

Attached: comeonnow.jpg (840x514, 65.84K)

Are you a Trot?

Sounds awesome! Sign me up!

yes

Well, then I merely made an educated guess. More importantly, please send love and affection in the form of newspapers my way

I bet they cock tease a lot, desu.
With the promise of penetration after you join. (which they never provide for the ugly recruits)
This is my fetish.

I just want to lay in bed with a cute Trot gf (male or female) and hear all about what Trotsky, Lenin, Marx, and Hegel have written and we spoon.

Attached: frog love me.jpg (1068x1066, 145.25K)

How tf did this thread turn into trot-lust?? Is FBI doing this?

tfw when no fat sweaty hairy maoist bf whispering Quotations from Chairman Mao Tse-tung into your ear.

The IMT/Fightback is a typical Trotsky sectarian cult filled with sexually assaults. Whenever someone tries to speak out, they are shut down in public.

reddit.com/r/Canadian_Socialism/comments/89ihkj/socialist_fightback_banned_from_cupe_3903_picket/

fuck off red lib

"LIES YOU REVISIONIST LIB!!!11"
Stay classy, ☭TANKIE☭ scum.

Watch: The Future of US Socialism, with Bhaskar Sunkara & John Peterson

facebook.com/socialistrevolutionIMT/videos/479380842555594/

Attached: templemarxists.jpg (745x960, 109.55K)

Bump

The livestream crashed

New livestream: facebook.com/socialistrevolutionIMT/videos/508727586278858/

Can't believe Peterson lost to a SocDem.

Don't play around with Trotskyism. I would also recommend calling the police if you encounter any

Did you watch the debate?

Bhaskar was eloquent and had a clear articulation of things, even if I disagree with a lot of it.
John Peterson was all over the place and basically made Leninism look like shit.

Around the Four, expect a sore.

The 'debate' was structured in Sunkara's favour since he went second so with every question Peterson tried to give a general answer to, Sunkara was able to undermine and misrepresent Marxism but Peterson wasn't given a chance to refute him except trying to squeeze in some point of contention before moving onto the next question he was being asked.
Sunkara said a whole lot of nonsense and Peterson was having a hard time keeping up with trying to correct him and answer the very inspecific debate questions/topics. Still it was enjoyable to watch. The liberal 'socialist' who asked the first q&a question was hilarious tbh.

Make whatever excuses you want.
The IMT did not dominate the debate and at the end the SocDem left the interaction feeling like he won.

The SocDem left feeling like he won because he is an idiot who doesn't understand dialectics. No matter what happened, he would have felt like he won.

The Leninist was fierce about using antiquated jargon.
The Social Democrats will unfortunately end up winning because they don't have the need to LARP everywhere they go.

this didn't happen and is a retarded line of attack
literally what? At what point did anything even slightly LARPy take place?

There are probably like 10 words in socialist vernacular that might be considered "jargon" and they are easily explained and already known by millions. This meme needs to die.