The 'debate' was structured in Sunkara's favour since he went second so with every question Peterson tried to give a general answer to, Sunkara was able to undermine and misrepresent Marxism but Peterson wasn't given a chance to refute him except trying to squeeze in some point of contention before moving onto the next question he was being asked.
Sunkara said a whole lot of nonsense and Peterson was having a hard time keeping up with trying to correct him and answer the very inspecific debate questions/topics. Still it was enjoyable to watch. The liberal 'socialist' who asked the first q&a question was hilarious tbh.
IMT vs DSA
Make whatever excuses you want.
The IMT did not dominate the debate and at the end the SocDem left the interaction feeling like he won.
The SocDem left feeling like he won because he is an idiot who doesn't understand dialectics. No matter what happened, he would have felt like he won.
The Leninist was fierce about using antiquated jargon.
The Social Democrats will unfortunately end up winning because they don't have the need to LARP everywhere they go.
this didn't happen and is a retarded line of attack
literally what? At what point did anything even slightly LARPy take place?
There are probably like 10 words in socialist vernacular that might be considered "jargon" and they are easily explained and already known by millions. This meme needs to die.