Open source economic planning

>Now I just get this little pit feeling in my lungs
That's a common symptom from sucking donkey dick.

Nobody is stopping someone from becoming certified
Well marine scientists would know
If the plan gets majority vote its approved if its vetoed it doesn't and a new plan is made.
It'd be more inefficient and cumbersome true, but it'd also be more democratic.

It's totally possible that people will be deprived of degrees based on their politics since having one will involve political power. Giving someone a degree will always be a political decision so it will be impossible to make it a neutral process. This is why I think that at least major decisions should decided by the people.

All knowledge is useful but should not be used to constraint an open source system, we should seek maximum flexibility and by that I mean that no matter the hierarchy of the principles that rule the rules below, it should be able to be subject to edition even this very same idea. The speed, the diversity of the experiments, the modes of voting, or even different and weirder methods, anything that our imagination can conceive should occur and all the ways to verify and justify knowledge. No language game is a priori true! It should be a system that in principle is as simple as it can possibly be so that it can accomodate for almost all possibilities, and actively work towards them as an actively open mind, one that keep accelerating its way to a multifaceted world of dynamic utopias, the perfect environment for creativity all because we decided to not ignore the other voices and thus to actively search to elucidate those blindspots as efficiently as it is possible, it's just the passion for alternatives that should drive us forward: say, you could even at this point in time perhaps look for people that are able to synthesize knowldge and search for conensus on whether the knowledge does represent the view of such ensemble of people. But that's just one way, you can assign some internet-based forum or something that allows people to ask questions about each part of every idea so that we can better listen and ground everyone's opinions logically and use the one that can best achieve the greatest objectives (that is, we should try not to be pedantic except for the unseen greater good), we could vote on values and propose different solutions to eachieve those values. All of you, all of your opinions are valid, and useful and true in their way but we have to discover in what way precisely, each one works and it's all part of an enormous system that doesn't necessarily need a bureaucracy because it's not a closed finished system but rather an increasingly open system that keeps expanding, that keeps flourishing the beauty of the collective! Starting all the way from some such default design! :D

I think there should be a referendum for budget allocation.

Attached: _44094063_tax_spending_gra416.gif (416x215, 9.43K)

gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html