Sign it, we have no need for chemical weapons, bunkers are all we need!
Ostalgie Thread: Bunker edition
Thomas Peterson
Aiden Peterson
Don't sign it, it costs money to get rid of them and we need all the money we can get right now.
Jose White
Sign and secretly fail to comply.
Sebastian Rodriguez
Use their own systems against them. Sign and secretly continue.
Matthew Bell
Don't sign it,it doesn't worth the effort. JUST SAY NO.
Xavier Torres
The Politburo decided to try to hide the fact that we did not abide by the convention, but due to the weakness of Sigurimi, the world quickly learned of this. We have decided to not allow the film Intergirl to be shown(no other options) due to the moral degenaracy and criticism of socialism it contains. Now the issue at hand is a domestic one, the intelligentsia is pushing for the release of all political prisoners, despite us already ssuing amnesties in 1986. Some people in the party are also calling for the fight against religion and tsekhoviks(illegag economic actors) to be weakened. Due to revisionism in the party, we cannot deny both of these. Our options are to either implement both policies, or only implemen one. What does the Politburo think?
Joseph Gutierrez
Ease the pressure, but not amnesty.
Robert Carter
What a shitty policy maker we have.
Easing policy means we'll give opposition breathing room to organize. I'd say we release these figures but don't relieve the pressure. Even if a few traitors are let free to organize in secret at least they won't be able to gather support publically or rally around reactionary organizations like the church, right?
Dylan Morales
Support the ease but not amnesty policy.
It was times of Alia,the guy who finally gave up socialism for socialdemocracy.
Jose Morales
Release prisoners but do not ease the pressure.