Has not experienced a significant economical crash since before ww2

to further on this, this notion that sweden is socialist is literally only a product of american political illiteracy. nowhere else in europe do people talk about sweden as socialist either. the swedish economic mode of production is objectively bourgeois.

as far as bourgeois society goes, it is far better than in the U.S., as someone who has experienced both, but we are communists, a better bourgeois society isn't what we advocate.

Excuse me?

No, but new zealand isnt rich by european standards at all. It does have pretty good farmland though.


Pic looks like a gay porn

reconsider

How's the alienation factor?

Cause if your waifu is a slut and there's still mods burn it all down anyway. Including whoever the fucking garbage heap was that banned OP when that was the first articulated argument I've seen in months

Attached: 3f2bd74e772a2a665addfc297e15a9a5943e8d6e224fd31a3777efa65bb709ba.jpg (2048x1630, 882.24K)

Why must I be torn apart in this way?

how exactly does norway benefit from wasting money in afghanistan?

It's leftist board, if you want arguments why leftist is better than rightism, go here 8ch.net/leftypol/res/2300211.html

Imperialism is not military doing stuff
8ch.net/leftypol/res/2300211.html

imperialism is economic exploitation. Norway dos benefit from resources stealth and cheap labor.

Attached: what imperialism is.jpg (533x526, 92.5K)

p.s. if war in Afghanistan was waste of money, crapitalist countries would not engage in it.

The person who wrote that is definition of brainlet, just as mentioned in this post