Julian von Abele

I mean objectively there's a very high likelihood that human civilization will be destroyed in the next couple of centuries because of capitalism, being a serf or a slave is shit but at least it's ecologically sustainable

I don't think either of those posters were saying what you probably think they're saying. The idea of the "noble savage" a reactionary idea and I would find few who would deny it as such, but you're asking us our opinion on a literal who who said some statement in what I assume is an argument while drunk.

The phrasing of this is very poor implies both moralism and a problem with modern development

Either way, historical absolutism is retarded, video related.
youtube.com/watch?v=vM2Arjuw43I

He deserves to be beaten to death for being a western chauvinist. Sage for Zig Forums thread.

It poses a question of whether you can be allowed to state objective truths or not, if they're offensive to some people.

Elements of liberals, or whatever you want to call them, want to demonize objectively useful ideologies, technologies, etc. because "white men did them, and white man bad."

One always has to ask why a truth is being stated.
Often, the man reminding you that high ranking communist Mr. Leon Trotsky did Kronstadt is - believe it or not - acting in bad faith, not simply trying to preserve the historical record.

Like what?

lmao gay

Based Kim (pbuh) cannot push the button fast enough.

Attached: b6aedaad9478dd0299ea7018fc1b803de34183b7009eb629dc468372220efaf1.jpg (2247x1342, 855.85K)

Yes, you can. Of course, there is context to consider like if I implied you were primitive because you're ancestors were primitive. Now, objectively you're ancestors were probably primitive, but contextually why are you saying that to me, to be informative or imply something about me?
And I agree that's retarded, please refer to the video here as a summery to why .

Yeah it's basically my long observation that sheltered Europoors don't understand race relations.