On Karl Marx and "uncivilized" nations

destroy the western nations siphoning resources from them

that's literally the only way because the second they start to "get going" america or one of its pawns will roll in and fuck them. e.g: libya, iraq, venezuela, argentina, chile, mexico, nicaragua, iran, etc, etc, etc

part of the reason the us government is so keen to crush north korea is because of its successful nuclear program and it's objective effectiveness as a deterrent, particularly after libya did everything the west wanted: gave up its 'terror' programs, made steps towards liberalization, renounced its WMD program, and then got crushed by Obama anyway

they are poor nations because of rich nations and that's all there is to it

t. gulius ebola
:DDDDD

Someone post that meme with spurdo evola comparing something with aristocracy

Back when Karl Marx was writing that, being an undeveloped country likely meant still being feudal or slaving. Definitely capitalism would be an improvement over that. Today capitalism is 99,9% universalized so that argument is no longer relevant.

what does being lazy have to do with feudalism though

The lord will get mad if you don’t get good turnip yields.

yes so how is having non-lazy people gonna change that, which is what Red Flag was implying Marx was implying.

Read the OP more carefully. OP isn't really interested in the "lazy" part, he asked about Marx's thoughts on underdeveloped societies and their relationship with capitalism.

Marx and Engels supported Colonialism and Imperialism if it was to advance history, which was to bring people into Capitalism because the only way that Communism can happen is if everyone is in Capitalism.

Shit like Land Reforming and etc is actually to advance Capitalism because Landlords are literally Feudalism.

Marx was from 1800s Europe, back than even relatively developed societies like Japan and Latin America (the latter of which just basically being Europeans in a shitty environment) were still seen as backwards and inherently inferior. Given that capitalism could only develop in an area where labor has to be specialized with tones of resources, such as Germany and England (aka, where Marx spent almost his entire life) he probably fell for the "Europe is blessed by divine favor" thing everyone else did.

Japan was unironically better than Europe. European influence fucked up Japan

It didn't have factories nor cool nik-naks so Europeans saw it as below them.

Capitalism produces effective social labour networks, so the proletariat appropriating leadership of industry in a global capitalist society is the best way to maintain socialism, that's why I feel optimistic about how trade operates today. China and Russia weren't capitalist before their attempts at socialism, which is why I feel that both failed - but today, any western country could easily transition into socialism.

Is it a misfortune that magnificent California was seized from the lazy Mexicans who did not know what to do with it?”

So it's always fake if it contradicts your beliefs? Marx used the word nigger himself since his uncle was a slave trader. He used the English word since it didn't exist in German. Maybe Yiddish but not in ger!man at the time. Oh but that must be fake too. Prophet Marx is infallible.