destroy the western nations siphoning resources from them
that's literally the only way because the second they start to "get going" america or one of its pawns will roll in and fuck them. e.g: libya, iraq, venezuela, argentina, chile, mexico, nicaragua, iran, etc, etc, etc
part of the reason the us government is so keen to crush north korea is because of its successful nuclear program and it's objective effectiveness as a deterrent, particularly after libya did everything the west wanted: gave up its 'terror' programs, made steps towards liberalization, renounced its WMD program, and then got crushed by Obama anyway
they are poor nations because of rich nations and that's all there is to it
Joshua Lewis
t. gulius ebola :DDDDD
Austin Powell
Someone post that meme with spurdo evola comparing something with aristocracy
William Carter
Back when Karl Marx was writing that, being an undeveloped country likely meant still being feudal or slaving. Definitely capitalism would be an improvement over that. Today capitalism is 99,9% universalized so that argument is no longer relevant.
Tyler Brown
what does being lazy have to do with feudalism though
Hunter White
The lord will get mad if you don’t get good turnip yields.
Joseph Martinez
yes so how is having non-lazy people gonna change that, which is what Red Flag was implying Marx was implying.
Jason Robinson
Read the OP more carefully. OP isn't really interested in the "lazy" part, he asked about Marx's thoughts on underdeveloped societies and their relationship with capitalism.
Brayden Reed
Marx and Engels supported Colonialism and Imperialism if it was to advance history, which was to bring people into Capitalism because the only way that Communism can happen is if everyone is in Capitalism.
Nathan Gomez
Shit like Land Reforming and etc is actually to advance Capitalism because Landlords are literally Feudalism.
