Need help getting back into radicalism

Was he white? I'd start fucking non-whites if I were you. Real talk. It's a lot more likely a non-white male can be a half-decent lefty in America then you're average white man. You know what to do.

By tumblr's definition, he's white.

By Zig Forums's definition, he's not.

t.
white liberal

This is retarded Zig Forumsyp logic. Ironically though, it implies anyone on Zig Forums is white at the same time.

Read Stalin and Lenin unironically. Think dialectically. Exercise. Eat healthy. Post boobs

I'm a little too advanced for Lenin and Stalin.

If you were too advanced for comrade Stalin you wouldn't have to ask for an advice here

Attached: 0f3.png (3340x3176, 204.59K)

By that I mean, I've read a lot of philosophy and can pinpoint the stuff Lenin and Stalin get wrong too easily. I need something much more advanced, like something which would "debunk" (for lack of a better term) the bulk of western poli phil from a Marxist or anarchist perspective (especially classical liberals, or anyone promoting the idea that the state is "natural" or whatever).

Ok anarkiddie, you get the bullet too.
On a serious note, I'm not that good at theory so I can't suggest you any literature. But if you are so advanced, then I'm sure you can apply your own spicy dialectics to debunk whatever you want. It's unethical to just be a consumerist of others knowledge and theory when you have advanced dialectics that are indistinguishable from magic, I think

Attached: before-marx-devil-horn-hair-myopic-food-in-beard-uses-808864.png (500x522, 133.27K)

Why would Lenin debunk Aquinas, Locke or Hegel, or whomever else neocons read?