His hypothesis doesn't make sense though. Europe has always had the most readily arable land and the most easily available game. Following the hypothesis of intelligence developing through environmental pressures, we ought be the dumbest of all people.
Luckily, humanity does not conform to standard Darwinian mechanism because we're a mutualist and cooperative race, so applying the mechanisms of lowly animals to a race that form societies with highly specialised roles is going to be crude and inaccurate at best.
Too bad you can't say the same about your sexual encounters.
Jason Howard
that's the point you fucking idiot you don't need to farm if you can just walk into the jungle and pick some fruit you don't need to form a complex societly to distribute you available resources, if all resources are available to you with little effort. yeah that's why europe has lost a huge percentage of its endemic fauna after the ice age, while north america was able to sustain it until europeans arrived. the rise of europe can mostly be attributed to geography and it has nothing to with race. kill yourself
Fucking lamo wut? That's now how societies in jungled areas exist at-all…
William Baker
Eskimos and the various Siberians were renown for their above average memories and visuo spatial abilities when they were first started being integrated into the public school systems of the ussr and the usa
Connor Perez
Really because the Russians thought they were fucking stupid (Like all Russian humour about the Kamchatkan is that they're stupid).
Landon Torres
Prove that there are races. So far they are always shown to be arbitrary classifications over phenotypes that are distinct only to human tastes. You can draw correlations between anything using that method. Hey, did you know all the most devastating and brutal wars of the 20th century were started by white people. Interesting correlation huh?. What do you think of that?
