This is the end of Drumpf *for real*, isn’t it?

This is the end of Drumpf *for real*, isn’t it?
rt.com/news/448730-trump-devastate-turkey-kurds-syria/?utm_source=browser&utm_medium=push_notifications&utm_campaign=push_notifications

Attached: 72153E2C-2106-468B-86E9-1A7BB916DEAE.jpeg (750x706 270.86 KB, 278.17K)

Other urls found in this thread:

books.google.com/books?id=NmzT3q0k5XMC&pg=PA414&lpg=PA414&dq=Revolutionierungspolitik&source=bl&ots=DH6l68pLOg&sig=pFWaUOb1tUSycLH_sEHlwQfC2Uk&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjqu7io3L3UAhXGQD4KHZsIDBkQ6AEIJDAA#v=onepage&q=Revolutionierungspolitik&f=false
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Calling it now

WE TRIED TO WARN YOU

WHY DIDN'T YOU ANARKIDDIES LISTEN?

You forgot the part where Turkey tries to get even closer to Russia first

dup btfo

Apparently Assads a puppet as well

This is something the rust belt will love, and since they're so anti war the mask slipping is going to lead to some Kaisserreich level shit in the U.S

Is the US some mirror universe shit where the conservatives do anti-imperialist stuff and the centre-left are the biggest warhawks?

Damascus is the legitimate government and not dependend on foreign aid.
Rojava is supplying bases to a foreign force that illegally operates there and created the situation in the first place, striking against the national souvereignity and legal government of Syria.
You are an idiot.

Ah yes, of course… "safe zone". Just what exactly is it they're securing? Selflessly the kurds, of course, isn't this just the altruism you expect from the USA, the bastion of freedom and democracy, spreading socialism and progress. Just like Israel, amirite? And again, western anarkiddies making themselves useful idiots spreading Pentagon propaganda withint he left.

Right-wingers tend to be accidently vulgar anti-imperialists: Enoch Powell, a British tory MP famous for warning that "in 20 years the black man shall hold the whip over the white" was not only anti-colonialist but tried to end british decolonisation wars.

books.google.com/books?id=NmzT3q0k5XMC&pg=PA414&lpg=PA414&dq=Revolutionierungspolitik&source=bl&ots=DH6l68pLOg&sig=pFWaUOb1tUSycLH_sEHlwQfC2Uk&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjqu7io3L3UAhXGQD4KHZsIDBkQ6AEIJDAA#v=onepage&q=Revolutionierungspolitik&f=false
This is possibly the U.S is doing to prevent Turkey from joining the Shia axis, as they can't depend on the Israelis, or even the U.S since they're trying to warm things up with Russia.

They're (Hezbollah,Russia, and Iran) not natural allies Tomostache they'd turn on each other the second it'd help Not all too different from one big US military base in Syria (it'd just be harder)

*Doing this

no, the end of trump will be when the mueller investigation releases its findings several months from now

All as lord Trotsky planned.
But for real, you Talkies have been telling the US to pull out of Syria and when they do you hate them for it. In your eyes the US will just be some vague notion of evil. Stop this and start being consistent. Also there’s nothing wrong with telling Turkey not to attack Kurdistan, their a socialist nation. Their revolution should be protected.

Attached: TrotskyCivilWar.jpg (600x828, 198.8K)

You have to be sure you specify that this only works through deals, and not warfare, otherwise you'll be banned for imperialism lad

Tbh Tank lords vs Trot shitposters only differ in their characterization of a dead leader, and stupid arguments like this

This is what a 20 mile safe zone looks like, btw:

Attached: ClipboardImage.png (713x545, 132.25K)

He's not wrong, Turkey does not have the credit to waste on a prolonged military engagement right now.

That's still enough to stagnate a border, and distract Turkey. Just look at the Russia/Ukraine situation right now.

Dude Rush Limbaugh is saying the USA should pull out of Syria while John Bolton is using Noam Chomsky to stay in.

Shit is insane

I mean it is not a feasible concept: Kobane is on the border, the kurds will fight to a man/woman for that city, well they already did…
Still, Erdogan won't put in troops while the US is there, too much risk. To add to that the axes of Turkish attack now all have SAA troop concentrations in them.

Only Nixon could go to China yadda yadda ya
There is potential for a shift of conservatives toning down on the imperialism (but they will never be anti-imperialist) while liberals rev up the hawking but either way it's not gonna be significant and something we should really care about.

This is good it removes the factor of direct US intervention in Syria while at the same time giving R..Ojava and Assad enough breathing room to continue to hash the deal out and work out what to do with turkey

of what things that haven't happened yet?


Come on now

Rojava

since when did this happen?

Kurd, Kurds, one big US military base in Syria, Kurdistan

This is tucking their tails between their legs and calling it a win. Only Bolton is literally crazy enough to want to stay there and continue to try to remove Assad despite the majority of the region currently being secured by Pro-Assad forces and ISIS being all but eliminated.

American imperialists are too narcissistic to give a damn what their actions look like to the people within Syria. If Chomsky can do mental gymnastics about why the United States should stay in Syria, then presumably a bunch of career politicians, media personalities, and military men can do the same.


The entire propaganda machine is arrayed against Syria and Assad, Bolton isn't some oddball in the corner on this front.

Attached: white-helmets.jpg (650x361, 55.41K)

At some point somebody realized that people in bubbles will swallow whatever bullshit their prophets tellem, and that therefore if you wanna sneak something by unopposed you have the unorthodox side do it. That way the subservient masses swallow it while the normally opposed masses see nothing wrong with it.

Look at Obama being a bigger war hawk than Bush.

Been like that for the better part of a year IIRC.

Why was this anchored? It’s actually relevant geopolitics