Yeah, Marx always had in mind grievance and gender studies as the correct way to expropriarte the means of production.
As I said: lost cause.
Yeah, Marx always had in mind grievance and gender studies as the correct way to expropriarte the means of production.
As I said: lost cause.
Something which was never even mentioned in my post. I just said trannies are not a product of capitalism and that similar notions have existed in cultures throughout time. Your remarks are just stupid
I'm sure Marx wouldn't sperg out either like you are
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
unironically no u. He just told you about why gender dysphoria was created by rigid systems like classes, and religion. It's not much of a stretch to say this might be caused by capitalisms tendency to forget about body shapes, actually healthy curves, not being obese and unjustified gender roles
Only by attributing all alternative cultural practices around sex roles to the recently developed category of "transgender," subsuming them and partly misunderstanding them. These practices were based more on one's actions/behavior or cultic/ritualistic functions, rather than individual psychological identification with the male or female, as the modern transgender in Western culture. Regardless, it doesn't necessarily imply anything beyond the performance of sex roles coming to determine societal identification of men and women in those societies. "Transgender" as an identity category in Western culture is specific to late capitalism.
It's been purposefully blown out of proportion by corporations because it's marketable. It sells clothes, it promotes movies/shows as being diverse, and it gets you publicity on social media.
Then they completely forget about where all their problems come from. They whine and whine but still fail to realize that these businesses are responsible for all of their problems. Dumbass neolibs. They just LARP as socialists.
The eternal conspiritard
Still, who cares? Live and let live.
Abandoning Marxism because of a few queers?