Best arabic bible

is there an arabic bible closest to the KJV in arabic?

Attached: 1543954663431.jpg (1920x1080, 642.95K)

Other urls found in this thread:

mliles.com/melkite/arabicbible.shtml
bl.uk/collection-items/the-trial-of-henry-garnet-1606
bibles.com/catalogsearch/result/?q=Catalog #105413, ISBN 1-58516-210-8 ARABIC BIBLE WITH DEUTEROCANONICALS.-Today's Arabic Version
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

The King James Bible is Rosicrucian trash. Use a Melkite Arabic Bible instead, you can buy them here, God bless you, you may have to send an email to the Church to procure a copy:
mliles.com/melkite/arabicbible.shtml

Attached: Bishop_Nicholas_Samra-660x350.jpg (660x350, 105.88K)

Arabic is the language of Satan. Any Christian who even dares to speak a single word of that heretical language is going to hell. Only blasphemers like Muslims speak it because they invented it for their blasphemous beliefs. Stay away from it at all costs.

God's word isn't bound to a single language

Yes it is.

Do you really want to be speaking the same language as Islamic trash? Do you really want to be speaking the same language that some Santanically possessed false prophet spoke in 1400 years ago? I wouldn't!

Genesis 11:7
Acts 2:1-13
1 And when the day of Pentecost was fully come, they were all with one accord in one place.
2 And suddenly there came a sound from heaven as of a rushing mighty wind, and it filled all the house where they were sitting.
3 And there appeared unto them cloven tongues like as of fire, and it sat upon each of them.
4 And they were all filled with the Holy Ghost, and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance.
5 And there were dwelling at Jerusalem Jews, devout men, out of every nation under heaven.
6 Now when this was noised abroad, the multitude came together, and were confounded, because that every man heard them speak in his own language.
7 And they were all amazed and marvelled, saying one to another, Behold, are not all these which speak Galilaeans?
8 And how hear we every man in our own tongue, wherein we were born?
9 Parthians, and Medes, and Elamites, and the dwellers in Mesopotamia, and in Judaea, and Cappadocia, in Pontus, and Asia,
10 Phrygia, and Pamphylia, in Egypt, and in the parts of Libya about Cyrene, and strangers of Rome, Jews and proselytes,
11 Cretes and Arabians, we do hear them speak in our tongues the wonderful works of God.
12 And they were all amazed, and were in doubt, saying one to another, What meaneth this?
13 Others mocking said, These men are full of new wine.

Jesus saves all men, even the 1.5 billion deceived muslims/arabs

Get real and get out of your embarrassing stunted little sideshow that your own pope apologized for

Arabic predates Islam

Way to alienate the millions of Arabic Christians.

Rosicrucians worked on the King James Bible lmao
but sure I'm the one just pulling a stunt. Look into Francis Bacon for starters and his involvement with the Rosicrucians. I mean most of your lot believe the tiny Illuminati took over the Catholic Church centuries ago, why is it so far fetched that Rosicrucians didn't influence the King James Bible?


Actually plenty of nonMuslims speak the language because it was enforced upon them. What would you have Egyptian Christians and Syriac Christians do for example? The Syriac Orthodox and Coptic Churches have preserved Aramaic and Coptic for the Church Liturgy, but 99% of people don't know how to speak that language. Arabic has unfortunately become the main language of Middle Eastern and Asian Christendom.

Attached: download (19).jpg (259x194, 5.37K)

No, they just happened to be born in one of the many Arabic speaking countries. "Arab" != "Muslim". Even Muhammad spoke Arabic for 40 years before Qur'an was "revealed" to him. You have to learn to separate Arab from Islam or you, too, will alienate millions of Christians.

I'm talking about the 99% deceived. Coptic church is strong in egypt at 10% of their population, but daily they get killed. Didn't mean to alienate them with that post.
1 Corinthians 12

Rosicrucians spread out beyond Germany, and the idea that a Hermetic Christian Kabbalist society got popular at a time when that was already happening with various other societies and just people in general is not really far fetched at all. Hell, some of the English Dissenter groups were Hermeticists, and Masons flourished in those types of groups due to the common revolutionary attitude of them.

Attached: d52f093b08750b05b20ea792d6af533af82d4761b560d9cce35d62d789037e88.jpg (800x541, 429.21K)

reminder that a jesuit named guy fawkes tried stopping the KJV translation from happening but God prevented it

Are you retarted he wasn’t even a Jesuit, he was a Catholic convert because he thought Protestant theology was bullshit.

Guy Fawkes cannot have been a Jesuit. Jesuits do not have a third order. You cannot be a Jesuit unless you are literally a priest.

Please learn who the Jesuits are before you post here again.

bl.uk/collection-items/the-trial-of-henry-garnet-1606
Garnet was an English priest of the Catholic Jesuit order. The Jesuits were banished from England in 1585 so Garnet and other Jesuits ministered and worshipped in secret. Several Jesuit priests were executed in the 1590s.

Same person totes, amirite?

...

What in God's name is that supposed to mean?
How do you transplant linguistic autism over a medieval english from the Middle Ages into the Middle East.

Jesuits were behind the Gunpowder Plot, but the idea it was to prevent the KJV is a retarded Andersonite meme. There were already several English translations that they couldn't just stop from existing. The anti-KJV theory presupposes not only that the KJV is a reinspired text, but also that the Roman Catholic Church knew this in advance. The actual goal was to force Romanism onto the country. They would blow up parliament while it was in session, thereby killing the entire government. The explosion would also have been dramatic enough to serve as a signal, and upon the explosion a Romanist army lying in wait would enter London and openly proclaim anti-Scottish motivations to prevent the populace from rising up at the last moment where the plot could fail. Then, upon consolidating their control, they would hand England over to Spain, which would ban Protestantism and implement persecutions.

>implying Zig Forums's Zig Forums wing won't sperg out over mention of the language of the "mudslimes"

BOOM
fug the ignorance is strong in these ones.

OP, the Mozarab (remnant Iberian Christians conquered by Islam and their converts) snippets of the Bible, which include a complete Gospel of John, are the closest, oldest version that I could think of.
The Jews apparently had a crack, but I'd be wary of that.
Otherwise, you apparently have to wait until Catholicism stopped sperging out about Tyndale and less than two hundred years later wrote (1671) an Arabic translation, but I'm not sure there's any copies left. Or that you could still read them. The Van Dyck version sounds very KJV-ish because it uses literary Arabic words no one uses in every day language anymore (or ever).

There's these, fwiw, OP:
bibles.com/catalogsearch/result/?q=Catalog #105413, ISBN 1-58516-210-8 ARABIC BIBLE WITH DEUTEROCANONICALS.-Today's Arabic Version


That wouldn't be … the 1880-revised Jesuit translation, would it, user? Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm?

Attached: bible-translated-into-arabic-versions.png (987x294, 77.91K)

The Van Dyck Bible is a translation from the Textus Receptus that the King James is based on. It's the accepted translation by the Coptic Church, the Syriac Orthodox Church, and Arabic-speaking Protestants. The Trinitarian Bible Society (a Textus Receptus supporting group that sells King James Bibles for English speakers) sells Van Dyck Bibles, and also Steven Anderson has promoted the Van Dyck as an Arabic Bible (vid related, four minutes in).


Francis Bacon had nothing to do with the King James Bible. He also didn't write the works of Shakespeare.

thanks user. I don't like sanderson much but good video