What in God's name is that supposed to mean?
How do you transplant linguistic autism over a medieval english from the Middle Ages into the Middle East.
Best arabic bible
Leo Jenkins
Dominic Johnson
Jesuits were behind the Gunpowder Plot, but the idea it was to prevent the KJV is a retarded Andersonite meme. There were already several English translations that they couldn't just stop from existing. The anti-KJV theory presupposes not only that the KJV is a reinspired text, but also that the Roman Catholic Church knew this in advance. The actual goal was to force Romanism onto the country. They would blow up parliament while it was in session, thereby killing the entire government. The explosion would also have been dramatic enough to serve as a signal, and upon the explosion a Romanist army lying in wait would enter London and openly proclaim anti-Scottish motivations to prevent the populace from rising up at the last moment where the plot could fail. Then, upon consolidating their control, they would hand England over to Spain, which would ban Protestantism and implement persecutions.
Kayden Rogers
>implying Zig Forums's Zig Forums wing won't sperg out over mention of the language of the "mudslimes"
…
BOOM
fug the ignorance is strong in these ones.
OP, the Mozarab (remnant Iberian Christians conquered by Islam and their converts) snippets of the Bible, which include a complete Gospel of John, are the closest, oldest version that I could think of.
The Jews apparently had a crack, but I'd be wary of that.
Otherwise, you apparently have to wait until Catholicism stopped sperging out about Tyndale and less than two hundred years later wrote (1671) an Arabic translation, but I'm not sure there's any copies left. Or that you could still read them. The Van Dyck version sounds very KJV-ish because it uses literary Arabic words no one uses in every day language anymore (or ever).
There's these, fwiw, OP:
bibles.com
That wouldn't be … the 1880-revised Jesuit translation, would it, user? Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm?
Evan Long
The Van Dyck Bible is a translation from the Textus Receptus that the King James is based on. It's the accepted translation by the Coptic Church, the Syriac Orthodox Church, and Arabic-speaking Protestants. The Trinitarian Bible Society (a Textus Receptus supporting group that sells King James Bibles for English speakers) sells Van Dyck Bibles, and also Steven Anderson has promoted the Van Dyck as an Arabic Bible (vid related, four minutes in).
Francis Bacon had nothing to do with the King James Bible. He also didn't write the works of Shakespeare.
Bentley Hernandez
thanks user. I don't like sanderson much but good video