Indeed, Women have gone mad since they are not properly submitted as all the Church father say. It's hard to find a pure women, even in religious circles since the Church has become feminist.
If you can become a monk, become one (Matthew 19:12).
The Nature of Women
My mistake. I confused his name with Saint Blandina (we call her "Blandine de Lyon from where I'm from) a female martyr who impressed even the rugged men of the roman empire by her abnegation against the violences of the colliseum
The only feminine metaphor applying to God in the bible is maternity :
It can be putted in relation to saint Paul :
This softness, nurturing, compassion is the way of the interior. The way of the psyche, affection and passivity. That must be putted in under the control of the masculine pole. Or else you have our society : (((soft, nurturing, warm and loving))).
Women don't create life, they just bear it. Only God create, and men, to the extent they represent Him. The Virgin Mary is the model.
The psyche being inferior, it's more prone to attachment to this world and so, to go mad. So there is equality with men as they can obtain the same sanctification, but inequality in the extent this sanctification necessitate harder means in detachment (physical mean to preserve virginity).
Aquinas used religious sources. There is a significant nuance.
I heard of this saint when I was a child. Thanks for the remembrance, I'm french too. Are you the orthodox french user ?
I didn't know Aristotle was considered "religious"
Sorry for sounding condescending. But truth is truth, even the devil can sometimes mix truth with lies. If we start to banish doctrines on the basis that non-christian sources were used we might as well retro-actively excommuniate a lot of great theologiians.
en.wikipedia.org
I am not. I am a simple catholic. C'est sympa de voir qu'il y a des français ici.
Precisely, the feminist liberation in some regards was necessary, to free from the dread of complete abuse, but on the other hand, it teaches them to reach for independence and grow their ever more masculine side.
So they get to be more and more masculine, needing less of men, feeling less the need to submit, and at the same time growing in loneliness, and with them so do men, that without the feminine healing energy of women, tend to be more and more feminine themselves, again, with loneliness.
One good quote of the book I mentioned
But here is the thing, I never stated them as explicitly evil, but that they among the most emotionally brutal, in fact I think they aren't even aware of the damage they cause, they are the weaker sex, but only in physical form, when in their emotional side is capable of leaving men in shambles.
From psychology:
Another great quote from the book that I posted in the relationship thread:
This is again, something that work completely in their subconscious, many are completely unaware, specially inexperienced ones.
As I've explained in the other thread as well, they tend to seek men that are unavailable and give in to their wills, this for females that don't quite understand it, don't really know how to submit, and don't give themselves to commitment and god, can lead to an extremely unpleasant intimate life.
Where either seek bad boys, that in reality never really love them, will be abusive and never really care. Or when meeting really proper guys, who could actually be meant for them and commit, they drop him like a sack of shit, because they know how to submit.
Kek, a weird coincidence tbh.
Although I believe it's because we see them as some kind of spiritual mothers.
Like Our Lady, we venerate her because she's our adoptive mother.
why get married if your wife will never love you? for sex? that seems like a very raw deal to me.
Aristotle can be considered religious since he was monotheist. Plato too was religious. There is a nuance between using religious writtings of ancient pagans and modern "pseudo-spiritual" ones.
Ahah oui c'est sympa.