Isn't the Queen/King in theory the pope of the Anglicans?
Where does the Archbishop fits in?
I don't really understand the point of Anglicanism
They actually looked into it early on afaik but were surprised to learn that Mary was venerated in the Orthodoxy as well so droppppped it
Yes, the English Monarch is the leader of the CoE, but they appoint an Archbishop to run it for them. It's just a way to delegate the responsibility away from the royal family.
So the royal family is just there for church ceremonial purposes?
What if the queen wanted to stop the gay stuff in the CoE? Could she do it?
And what if the queen became Catholic or of other religion?
I can agree with that, especially since most of what Lancelot Andrewes Press (Western Orthodox publisher under the AOCANA) produces is reprints of Anglo Catholic materials, which I use in my daily stuff. Not to make a blog post, but I guess it shows that Anglicanism actually has preserved some stuff the Catholic Church lost after Trent.
The monarchs who established Protestantism in England received instruction from Reformed ministers.
(checked)
Ehh, if you want to look at it that way you can. I see it as thr monarch owns the land and the souls of the English
She could always fire the current Archbishop and appoint a new one. But she is a globalist whore, so I wouldn't expect that to happen until her and Charles (the current Crown Prince) passaway. I'm not sure if Prince William is a globalist or not rumor has it William confronted the Queen and Charles about Diana's death. Supposedly he is the new Crown Prince
LMAO never gonna happen. unless you go up agianst the Anglo-American world order and get prince related and the royals of Liechtenstein on the English throne
Me too that's why I think mocharchs should intervene more in the governing of the country.
Well it was her mother and the Queen and his dad didn't like her.
Wasn't she cucking Carlos with some dudes? I get the impression that she was an whore, correct me if I'm wrong and I apologise if I am.
soon
I agree, but I see why they appoint the Archbishop. The Monarch can't be in two places at the same time. Like how the owner(s) of a company appoints CFOs, CEOs, COOs to run the various divisions of a company, so too must a Monarch appoint other people to run the other divisions of a nation.
I heard that rumor aswell. I heard she was fooling around with a saudi prince and carried his baby. She had to be killed as to not have an islamic bastard ruin the prestige of the family. I personally think she was killed because she was going to expose the globalists like JFK was (RIP) and Charles wouldn't have any of that.
If you madlads can pull it off, more power to ya. But I see a Cromwell 2.0 rising to power before that happens.
The real line of the king is in Australia apparently.. but he doesn't want to be king. The line was broke before any of the Protestant/Catholic divide (I think started with the Hanovers), and goes back further.