What do you thinkabout E M Jones?

I see it in a very similar way

Check out his episode on Pornography, it was splendid.

Thanks for recommendations, will look into Michael Hoffman. I am familiar with M.R.J. I listen to him every week


And here we have race derail
tl.dr the guy that stands against race mixing is right.

I think he is based and epic

Attached: mike.png (1097x249 10.74 KB, 38.02K)

Isn’t the concept of race covered by natural law? God created Hawks and Penguins, who aren’t the same and have different behaviors, though they are both birds. Neither is “better”, though there are things each is better at, aren’t races the same? Am I confusing my concepts or misunderstanding?

Attached: 3601C57F-326F-4248-AB2C-C8862CF99253.jpeg (2048x1740, 1.03M)

Not really the best example. In taxonomy, both penguins and hawks come from the same class: Aves, which includes every other single bird. Humans are from the Mammalia class, which as the name might tell you, include every other single mammal in existence.

Hawks and penguins aren't even in the same order. All humans came from Noah's family, and later delineated into all the varieties we have now. For comparison, look at dogs. All dogs (Canis lupus familiar is) were domesticated from Canis lupus, the wolf. And yet many breeds look nothing alike, and if some paleontologist were to find a Boxer's and a Great Danes' skull, would likely conclude (without genetic analysis) that they were different species. And yet all breeds of domestic dog and wild dog can interbreed, and share a very recent history of delineation.
In short, it wouldn't be difficult for all varieties of mankind to have arisen shortly after the despisersion from Babel, with linguistic confusion creating barriers between tribes and castes and driving peoples away from each other.

How the heck are you going to afford it?

Attached: what.png (400x240, 16.62K)

Yeah, I should have said “Hawks and Doves”, but you get my point, no?

Dove: Order Columbiformes. Hawk: Order Acciptriformes. :^)
The point is God created mankind originally as one type, whatever that was (hint: the First Adam was created in the image of the Second Adam), and mankind later delineated as a natural biological consequence of forcible separation, which is no longer required to preserve the bloodline of the Messiah.

Not him, but as he's shown, your example is just as stupid.
Seriously, if i hear one more "race realist" give layman' anecdotes about donkeys and horses or dog breeds, instead of an actual, scientific argument using proper terminology, and their closest defence being "there are differences" im gonna stab somone.

The closest biological terms you could group humans in would be ecotypes and clines, kinda, if you actually wanna use something approaching biology.

Human diversity would be roughly equivalent to general mean variaton among those groupings.

Go read on taxonomy before parroting dumb memes.

Please don't do that, someone might get hurt.