This is literally what I said:
Yes, that's also what I said:
Then you slide right back into Nestorianism:
Once again, you are saying that Mary only gave birth to his human nature; that she is the Mother of Christ, not the Mother of God. The classic Nestorian heresy of Mary being the "Christokos" (a title literally used by Nestorious himself) and not the Theotokos.
Back to thread maybe:
I live with my feminist sister and she's been upset since yesterday because I told her my honest beliefs that male and female differences are biological, that most women are happiest as dedicated mothers and that the postmodern conception of female liberation is good for few outliers, but most women who give into it regret it later in her life. She says "it's gonna take a while to talk to you normally again, because I am shocked that you believe this".
I've apologized tonight if I said anything that might have been mean to her, although I don't think I have, I even hesitated on taking communion this morning because we shouldn't take communion when we're not reconciled with someone. But really she's the one who is upset with me.
It's hard not to feel guilt in these situations because I've made people upset for wanting to be faithful to God, including when I left my girlfriend, which hurt her terribly. There's a huge part of me that will not let go of the guilt of making someone upset even though what I've done is not sinful and it is theirs to deal with.
It just feels like since I've rejoined the Church, I keep having to upset people. I know Christ said that was supposed to happen, but I don't congratulate myself for that or I'll feel more proud than I have the right to. I'm just socially exhausted and feel like withdrawing from the world even more.
Really started to hate denomination monkeys and Zig Forums level larpers recently.
Too much condemnation for pure human failings without any attempt to give out a hand of forgiveness and none at all hope in redemption.
wtp is this about? You got beast mark on hand or head already? I don't need to log into to Mac D's where I live..
No, what you literally said was "He emerged from Mary's womb as two natures"
Because she did not give birth to the divine nature
Where did I say this? She is the mother of God, but the human nature is called God by virtue of being His own.
I remember your drawings from the other thread recently, no way qualified to give the v detailed constructive criticism the other learned user did but its a nice pic here
am i the only one that finds depictions of God the father as cringe? I don't like it, I don't like it at all
You deliberately left out the last part. And that is what Jesus Christ is: two natures undivided. His human nature in submission to his divine nature. I'm getting the vibe that you are not arguing in good faith, and this "discussion" is derailing the thread anyway as others have observed. We are done. God bless.