You give us the ideal of a republic and contrast it to an untrue generalisation about monarchies.
In comparative politics you can’t contrast an ideal for one system with what you deem a reality for another system. It’s just not an accurate way to compare systems. You have to compare the reality of democracy with the reality of monarchy. And I think monarchy fares well in comparison all things considered.
Just look at the state of American morality today.
The American regime today is highly tyrannical. Read the news brother. God bless.
I agree with your impulse, that's exactly what Hoppe writes in "Democracy, the God that failed". Your mistake is conflating republicanism with democracy, but these are two different things. Nobody si advocating democracy.
The king Id say is a better judge than any of these political appointee US judges today because the king doesn’t have to play politics. He didn’t come to power as part of some faction (unless there was some kind of pretender king war). He doesn’t answer to anyone generally.
Definitely republic is more tolerable but monarchy has a more proven track record imo.