Yehudi would be a more correct rendition of those from the Kingdom established by Judah (Yehudah), like Israeli, Iraqi, Yemeni etc. It would be better than the butchering of the name leading up to modern English, and in line with the Tiberian vocalization present in the extant Hebrew manuscripts from which many bible translations are derived.
Why don't we just call the Israelites of the Old Testaments Christians...
Isaiah Morgan
Angel Taylor
Also they weren't Christian, they were still offering sacrifices to 'Lord' in the temple. The son had not been revealed yet. Christians are followers of and believers in the Son.
They were an ethnic tribal entity with a claimed descent from Judah.
Jaxson Reyes
Also they weren't Christian, they were still offering sacrifices to 'Lord' in the temple. The son had not been revealed yet. Christians are followers of and believers in the Son.
The Jews were an ethnic tribal entity with a claimed descent from Judah.
Luis Cooper
They have original sin. Do you think that heaven before Christ descended into hell was full of babies?
Do you think unbaptized babies go to heaven?
Zachary Garcia
Why would babies go to hell if they are without sin?
Cooper Powell
Based
Semipelagianism is the final form of freedom from papist platonic shackles
Jace Carter
But we are the Jews, user. Jesus called his followers Jews. The 12 apostles were the symbolism for the 12 tribes of Israel. Paul called all followers of Christ Jews.
Jace Morris
Of course
Colton Perry
No they don't. You have to be baptized to go into Heaven. Baptism by desire isn't like you can desire for someone else to get baptized. By that logic I can desire the baptism of every child on earth, and now literally everyone is a Christian, (or ex Christian when they leave the faith that I baptized them with). It's utter nonsense pushed by semi-Universalists. If you claim there is no Limbo then you have to claim every baby on earth is automatically baptized by any random person's desire.
Cameron Moore
Why was this deleted twice now