I lean towards IFB. I was nondenom when I first got into the Bible. Then seeing that faith alone isn't truly taught among most denominations which includes nondemonationalism as it has denominational biases toward doctrine depending where they stem from, they pushed me farther IFB. Pretty much in the same way SJWs would push one farther right.
Jesus said you gotta strive to enter into the straight gate. You gotta strive because it's so easy to fall into the temptation of following satan's various brands of works salvation whether it be orthodox, Calvinist, catholic, Arminian, BHI, JW, SDA, sacred name, oneness, gnostic, Pentecostal, charismatic, free will Baptist, southern Baptist, Arminian, Islamic, Freemasonic, Jewish, Scientology etc., etc., etc., They all teach trusting in how good of a person you are, so you gotta strive for right doctrine, and that's the real easy believism. It's too easy to do something and then think yourself worthy for something you're not. It's too easy to be that prideful.
Jesus said there was a narrow path. I see the narrow path. That's why I fall in line with IFB.
You don’t “enjoy” the passions. The passions enjoy you as they are turning you into a soulless slave. Freedom is only possible in a society with a strict adherence to morality.
Atheism leads to a denial of mans dignity. We’re all just big computers right? We’re all just DNA according to this radical materialism. A computer does not have free will. A computer is just a machine to be used and broken without dignity. Mass shooters follow this to its rational conclusion. But fedoras can’t stomach that.
We all operate under the correct first premise that man has dignity. Theists have an argument explaining this: man is created in the image of God and therefore has dignity. Atheists don’t have one. It’s just muh feels. We feel like we have dignity. Blah blah blah.
Connor Reed
I don't think it would be accurate for me to say that I follow a certain denomination. When I came to believe, I simply started studying the Bible and my convictions automatically caused me to fall under the umbrella of Protestantism. Tho I don't know exactly which sub-denom of Protestantism.
Chase Anderson
Non-denom, but I follow free-will Baptist theology. It's the most historically and scripturally valid perspective IMO.
Jacob Diaz
Assemblies of God, mostly because of how I was raised and the work they do overseas. I'm always open to the idea that I may be wrong, but my driving belief behind denominations is "Unity on key issues and grace on secondary issues." I disagree with some of the tenets of my own church, much less other denoms, but I consider anybody who places their faith in Christ and believes the Nicene Creed as a fellow brother in Christ. I may be a prot., but I'll take a Catholic who truly believes over some cultural "Christian" who tolerates Sodomy and infanticide any day of the week.
Wyatt Nguyen
Lutheran because despite the memes hyper-conservative synods still exist, and the theology is sound.
